Intel’s upcoming high-end CPU failed to beat AMD

By Monica J. White Published October 1, 2024

An Intel Core Ultra Series 2 chip embedded in a piece of glass. — Kunal Khullar / Digital Trends

If various reports are anything to go by, Intel is about to expand its share of the best processors with the upcoming Arrow Lake. As a result, benchmark leaks are almost a daily occurrence at this point. While the flagship Core Ultra 9 285K is mostly doing a good job against its AMD competitors, the non-K version failed to beat the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and the Intel Core 9 14900.

The Core Ultra 9 285 appeared in a Geekbench 6 test, first shared by Benchleaks, and the scores are nothing to write home about. The processor scored 3,081 points in the single-core test, which is fairly competitive, and a measly 14,150 points in the multi-core benchmark, which is disappointing. In fact, while the single-core test went better, both of these scores put it firmly behind many CPUs that we’d expect it to be able to beat.

Recommended Videos

[GB6 CPU] Unknown CPU
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (24C 24T)
Min/Max/Avg: 5461/5579/5560 MHz
Codename: Arrow Lake
CPUID: C0662 (GenuineIntel)
Single: 3081
Multi: 14150https://t.co/zPyFYuKEoH

— Benchleaks (@BenchLeaks) September 30, 2024

Let’s start with the Ryzen 7 9700X. As noted by TechPowerUp, the recent AMD CPU scored 3,624 points and 19,381 points in single-core and multi-core, respectively. Meanwhile, the last-gen Core i9-14900K scored 3,083 points and 20,749 points on average. I checked the Core i9-14900 for good measure and found Geekbench 6 scores of 2,910 and 17,509 in single- and multi-core, respectively, which is a lot lower than the K CPU, but still higher than the upcoming Arrow Lake chip.

The CPU was paired with an Asus Z890-P motherboard and was able to achieve a maximum frequency of 5.5GHz. However, the base clock speed was fairly low, sitting at a mere 2.5GHz. The system also only had 8GB of DDR5-5500 RAM — an unexpected configuration for a high-end chip that could’ve had something to do with these poor results.

Some reports claim that the Core Ultra 9 285 might be locked to 65 watts. If that’s the case, that would also help explain the benchmark scores when compared to the Core Ultra 9 285K, which achieved over 21,000 points in Geekbench. On the other hand, until recently, AMD’s Ryzen 7 9700X was also limited to a lower thermal design power (TDP).

So, is the Core Ultra 9 285 doomed? Not at all. It’s too early to judge based on a single benchmark. We might be dealing with an engineering sample, driver considerations might come into play, and the 8GB of memory isn’t ideal, either. We should hold off on coming to a conclusion until these CPUs are out in the wild, which might not be long now, although the K parts are said to launch first. Leaks point to October 24.

Topics

Monica J. White

Computing Writer

Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…

Computing

AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel

A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Computing

Intel’s Battlemage might beat Nvidia and AMD to the punch

Intel Arc A770 GPU installed in a test bench.

Out of all the GPU news we've been getting in the last few weeks, information about Intel Arc Battlemage has been pretty scarce, Now, it appears that Intel might still surprise us. According to a new leak, Intel's next-gen desktop GPUs might join the ranks of the best graphics cards as early as next month. Launching in December would certainly give Intel an unexpected edge over AMD and Nvidia, and it's an edge that it could really use right now.

As always with these types of leaks, we're working with a vague message and reading into it to try and figure out what's going on. In this instance, the gossip comes from Golden Pig Upgrade Pack on Weibo, a user with a pretty good reputation.

Computing

AMD buying Intel? It’s on the table

A tray of Intel Core Ultra CPUs.

We think of AMD and Intel as exactly what they are -- fierce rivals. However, the U.S. government is encouraging Intel to consider a merger with a rival, such as AMD, to counteract the intense financial trouble the company has been in over the past several months, according to a report from Semafor.

Intel just released its earnings for the third quarter of the year, where the company revealed that it had lost $16.6 billion. Year-over-year, Intel's net profit margin has dropped by 6,064.76%. That's not a typo. Intel is bleeding money, and according to the report, the U.S. government sees the chipmaker as too important to go under. At the moment, Semafor reports that talks between the government and Intel are "purely precautionary," but multiple options to recover the brand are on the table.