Skip to main content

Intel promises DirectX11 for Ivy Bridge processors

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Intel’s big technology introduction for CES his year is its latest Core processors with integrated high-definition graphics capabilities designed to give AMD and Nvidia some competition in the performance graphics market. However, AMD has managed to steal some thunder with its low-powered Fusion chips that take on Intel’s Atom line and offer DirectX11 graphics support. Now, Intel is saying its integrated graphics controllers will get DirectX11 support too—but folks will have to wait until the next generation of CPUs, dubbed “Ivy Bridge.”

In an interview with IDG News service, Intel VP and PC Client group general manager Mooly Eden said Intel plans to offer DirectX11 support in the next generation of its processors for notebook and desktop computers, which should start shipping to OEMs and system integrators late in 2011—meaning they aren’t likely to get to consumers until 2012. The current Sandy Bridge chips offer support for DirectX10.1; Eden characterized the decision as timely, noting that it gives times for more applications to integrate support for DirectX11 and comparatively little software supports DirectX11 today. However, popular PC games are already supporting DirectX11…and the fact that AMD’s low-power Fusion chip was able to bring DirectX11 to the table now doesn’t make Intel’s graphics solution seem all that great in comparison.

Recommended Videos

In addition to providing more advanced graphical capabilities for games and other media-centric tasks, DirectX11 includes methods that enable everyday applications to tap into the parallel computing capabilities of graphics chips for everyday tasks.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Intel says the forthcoming Ivy Bridge chip line will be manufactured using a 22nm process, making them smaller and even more power-efficient than the Sandy Bridge chips, built using a 32nm process.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs. Intel Core i9-12900K: Benchmarks, specs, pricing
Someone holding the Core i9-12900KS processor.

The battle for the best CPU for gaming is on. AMD's hot new Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel's Core i9-12900K are two CPUs with very different approaches to high-end gaming performance, but both are equally impressive.

With eight cores and several hundred dollars separating them, it might seem like a foregone conclusion which is best. But with their unique hardware arrangements, the title of which is the best gaming processor of 2022  -- so far -- really is up for grabs.
Pricing and availability

Read more
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D shines in gaming benchmarks, beats Intel
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D box.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D continues being tested in gaming ahead of the embargo lift, and the results are very encouraging -- the CPU manages to keep up with the Intel Core i9-12900KF.

The processors were matched up in a variety of titles. In one of the tests, the 3D V-Cache AMD CPU actually beat Intel by nearly 30%.

Read more
Intel Core i9-12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: Flagship CPUs, tested
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel's 12th-gen Alder Lake processors are ushering in a new era of desktop computing. It's the first time we're seeing a hybrid architecture from a slot-in CPU, and it marks a shift in leadership at Intel. Still, a big red glow hangs over Intel's flagship Core i9-12900K -- and it comes from the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Both the Core i9-12900K and Ryzen 9 5950X are 16-core processors that are top of class in their respective product ranges, and they're among the best processors you can buy. To find out which one is better, we put both chips through a gauntlet of benchmarks and comparisons. And although there's a lot to talk about, one chip is clearly better than the other.

Read more