Skip to main content

Intel Raptor Lake could be a multitasking beast — here’s why

New unofficial benchmarks of the upcoming Intel Raptor Lake emerged, and this time around, the news is quite exciting. It seems that Intel’s 13th Gen processor might turn out to be a real multi-tasking beast, leaving its predecessor far behind.

The user who leaked the benchmarks admits that the chips are still not quite ready to go, but even so, they manage to outperform Intel Alder Lake by up to 28%.

Intel Raptor Lake chip shown in a rendered image.
Wccftech

This round of Intel Raptor Lake rumors comes from Lordzzz, a Chiphell forum member, who posted a picture of the chip along with some benchmarks and CPU-Z screenshots. The photograph of the chip features the whole thing without any blurring, including the Intel Confidential label as well as the variant code Q0D8. This stands for the engineering sample 1 (ES1), but the user has also provided benchmarks of the (even more impressive) ES3 sample, although that wasn’t accompanied by a photo of the chip. Both samples are of the same processor, the Core i9-13900K.

Recommended Videos

According to the leaker, the ES1 chip still has a fair share of problems that Intel will have to work its way through prior to the launch of the processors in the next few months. The CPU fails to hit the required frequency check marks and has some compatibility issues. As of right now, it also doesn’t support DDR4 memory, but that’s because of BIOS support on 600-series motherboards — that will come with time.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Despite all these hiccups, the ES1 chip still manages to shine in terms of specs and performance. The flagship Intel Core i9-13900K will boost the core count by a whole lot, delivering 24 cores and 32 threads, which breaks down to 8 performance (P) cores and 16 efficient (E) cores. It’s also said to feature a much larger combined cache of 68MB. Engineering samples are unable to hit the expected clock speeds just yet, but once we get there, rumors say that Intel Raptor Lake might hit the mythical 6GHz mark.

While we only have screenshots of the ES1, the leaker also teased the performance of the ES3 and compared the two. In this test, the ES1 chip maxes out at just 4.0GHz across all cores, but the ES3 hits as high as 5.5GHz in single-core and 5.3GHz in all-core boost clocks. ES1 chips also can’t be overclocked, but that feature is present in ES3. ES3 chips also have an impressive level of support for DDR5 RAM, and as Wccftech teases, they might support up to DDR5-8000. Let’s just hope that DDR5 RAM will start getting cheaper as the tech becomes more widespread when AMD Ryzen 7000 processors also add support for it, especially since Zen 4 will only support DDR5 and not DDR4.

CPU-Z screenshot of Intel Raptor Lake.
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v80), quality = 95 Lordzzz, Chiphell forum

Now, let’s take a look at some benchmark scores. In a CPU-Z benchmark, the ES1 chip scored 611 points in single-core and 13,014 points in multi-core tests. The ES3 shows marked improvement over its predecessor, hitting 880 points and over 18,000 points, respectively. Comparing the two to the Alder Lake flagship Core i9-12900K shows that the ES1 chip loses in single-core, but wins by 12% in multi-core. However, the ES3 truly shines, outpacing the Core i9-12900K by 7% in single-core operations and a whopping 28% in multi-core. It also beats the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 34% in single-threaded and 21% in multi-threaded performance.

It’s certainly nice to see the Intel Raptor Lake chip in action, seeing as the first benchmarks we’ve gotten had even worse clock speeds than those of the ES1 sample. Intel still has a bit of time to iron out the final issues before the chips start rolling out later this year, so things are only bound to improve.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
AMD didn’t even need its best CPU to beat Intel
A render of a Ryzen 9000 CPU.

Looks like the competition between AMD and Intel is about to start heating up again. AMD's upcoming second-best processor, the Ryzen 9 9900X, was just spotted in an early benchmark -- and the results are shockingly good. If this is what AMD can do with a 12-core CPU, what's going to happen when the 16-core version of Zen 5 appears in tests?

The happy news (for AMD fans, at least) comes directly from the Geekbench 6.2 database, and it all comes down to a benchmark of what appears to be a retail sample of the Ryzen 9 9900X. The chip scored an impressive 3,401 points in the single-core score, and 19,756 points in the multi-core score. That puts it far above its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7900X, but that's not its only success.

Read more
Intel just discontinued a CPU that’s only 2 years old
Core i9-12900KS processor socketed in a motherboard.

Intel is moving on. The company recently posted two Product Change Notifications (PCN) that announced the discontinuation of multiple processors, including the Core i9-12900KS that was released just over two years ago.

In addition to the special-edition version of the Core i9-12900K, Intel announced that it's discontinuing the remaining CPUs in its 10th-gen lineup. The main stack of Intel's 10th-gen lineup, including processors like the Core i9-10900K, has already been discontinued. The newest PCN includes less prominent models, such as Intel's Pentium and Celeron lineups. It also includes the Core i5-10400F, which has remained one of the more popular budget options among Intel's CPU options.

Read more
Four months later, Intel CPU stability issues remain
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

It's been over four months since the first reports of instability in Intel's top CPUs started cropping up, and we are yet to see a fix. Although Intel has been working with its partners on delivering updates that would address the problem, the company itself had to admit in a recent community post that it still hasn't found the root cause.

Meanwhile, hardware testers are finding that even using Intel's recommended workarounds still ends up in crashes and unstable performance -- and the only solutions that seem to work are things that you'll have to settle for.

Read more