Skip to main content

Intel ‘disgustingly’ rejected some faulty CPU returns, YouTuber says

Intel processors next to each other.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Intel has finally broken its silence on the instability issues plaguing 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs over the last few months, but it seems we’ve only gotten a half answer to the problem. Gamer’s Nexus posted a video breaking down what the YouTube channel called “Intel’s biggest fuckup” to date and showcasing how the problem goes beyond the reasoning Intel shared this week.

If you’re not up to speed, Intel posted a message on its forums pinning blame for instability on improper voltage requests within the CPU microcode. Basically, the processor was getting improper power, leading to instability and degradation within the CPU. That’s not the only problem with 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, however. Some CPUs are impacted by a manufacturing defect that isn’t fixable with a microcode update, and Intel didn’t address that in its public statement.

Instead, it only addressed the manufacturing error in a Reddit thread after the forum post. It’s a strange split considering how much more severe a hardware-level defect is compared to something that can be fixed with a microcode update.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Gamer’s Nexus originally broke the story on the manufacturing defect. Oxidation occurred within some early Intel 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs in the VIAs, which are interconnects between various layers of a silicon wafer. Intel says it addressed this issue in 2023 with manufacturing improvements and claims “only a small number of instability reports” point back to the manufacturing error.

Intel's Biggest Failure in Years: Confirmed Oxidation & Excessive Voltage

The problem is that at least some CPU return requests were rejected when Intel knew about this manufacturing issue, but didn’t make that information public. Alderon Games claims its server providers had returns rejected by Intel even after the manufacturing defect was known. Gamer’s Nexus claims at least some business-to-business and business-to-consumer returns were also “somewhat disgustingly, from my view point” rejected.

You may recall that Alderon Games said it could lose upwards of $100K in lost players due to Intel’s instability issue, and it isn’t the only game publisher claiming massive problems with Intel’s chips.

Although improper voltages seems to be the main driving force behind instability issues on Intel’s 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, there are other factors at play. One issue is oxidation, but Gamer’s Nexus says there could be other contributing factors as well. Intel says it has addressed the oxidation issue, but it has yet to clarify the date range of affected processors. It also hasn’t publicly said it will honor all return requests for processors impacted by the oxidation issue.

Intel’s microcode update is expected in mid-August, which the company says will solve the instability problems across its 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs. There are still a lot of lingering questions about what this microcode update will do. It could impact performance, for example, or it could expose a larger instability problem that goes beyond voltages. For now, all we can do is wait.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Gamers are flocking to return Intel CPUs — and some are permanently damaged
A hand holds the Intel Core i9-12900KS.

Intel's troubles with instability on 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs continues to escalate, and a new report suggests that gamers are returning these CPUs at a much higher rate than retailers expect. An anonymous European retailer says they've seen four times as many returns for 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs compared to 12th-gen, according to a report from French outlet Les Numeriques.

Returns have only ramped up recently, however. The retailer says that in the six months following the release of all three generations, the return rates are nearly identical. Looking at the rate now, however, 13th-gen CPUs are being returned four times as often as 12th-gen, while 14th-gen CPUs are being return three times as much. Given what we've learned about Intel's instability issue, this suggests that the processors do, indeed, degrade over time.

Read more
Intel breaks silence on disastrous instability problem
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

Intel has finally provided an update on instability issues on 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs. An update posted by Thomas Hannaford, Intel's communications manager, pins the instability on an error in the microcode that requests incorrect voltage numbers, leading to instability in the processor.

The company is releasing a microcode patch that "addresses the root cause of exposure to elevated voltages." Intel says that update should arrive in mid-August. In the meantime, Intel encourages users who are experiencing instability issues to reach out to its support team for assistance. The microcode error was discovered after Intel reviewed processors that were returned due to stability issues, suggesting Intel wants to make the situation right with affected users -- though it stopped short of apologizing for a months-long drought on communication on the matter.

Read more
Intel can’t stay silent for much longer
Someone holding the Core i9-12900KS processor.

"I'll never buy an Intel CPU at launch again."

That's what one Reddit user told me after I spoke with them about instability issues with their Core i9-13900K. The user said they went through four Core i9-13900Ks over several months, leaving them without a functioning gaming PC for three months due to repairs. Another told me they slowly replaced every component in their system expect for the CPU, saying they've "NEVER had an issue with Intel products." This time, though, the Core i9-14900K was the problem.

Read more