Skip to main content

Intel reveals $999 Core i7-5960X, which is the company’s first 8-core processor for consumers

intel reveals core i7 5960x haswell e cpu ee chip
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Read our full Intel Core i7-5960X review.

It’s virtually common knowledge that Intel’s CPUs blow away most of what AMD has to offer. This time, Intel has topped itself again, announcing the Core i7-5960X CPU, which features not two, not four, not six, but eight processor cores in total.

Recommended Videos

Code-named Haswell E, the Intel Core i7-5960X runs at 3GHz, and launches alongside Intel’s new X99 chipset. X99 paves the way for DDR4 RAM, and other technological improvements in the PC world. As is the case with Intel’s other processors, the Core i7-5960X features a Turbo Boost clock that can drive its clock speed up to 3.5GHz. If you want to go even higher than that, you’re more than welcome to. The Core i7-5960X’s cores are unlocked, so you can overclock this monster to go past its stock speed of 3GHz.

Eight cores sounds good on paper, but what does that translate to in performance? We conducted a bunch of synthetic benchmark tests, whose scores will appear in our upcoming Core i7-5960X review once it goes live soon. For now, all we’ll say is that this chip absolutely obliterates its predecessors when it comes to multi-threaded performance. Plus, as the specs sheet above states, it supports 40 PCI-Express lanes. This means that you can run two graphics cards in x16, and a third in x8. You can also slot in five motherboards and run each at 8x, but you’ll need a huge motherboard and case to pull off a setup like that.

Haswell E specs
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Unfortunately, there are some significant backwards compatibility limitations when it comes to the Core i7-5960X. You’ll need to get a new X99 motherboard in order to get it to work, because while the Haswell E specs sheet says that the 5960X is compatible with motherboards that have the LGA2011 processor socket, the fine print reveals that you need a motherboard with LGA2011-v3. If you try to stick this in a vanilla LGA2011 motherboard, it won’t work, so don’t even try.

On top of that, the new motherboard you’ll need to buy in order to enjoy this power requires DDR4 RAM. It is not backwards compatible with cheaper (and still-sufficient) DDR3 memory, which adds on to the total cost of a Haswell E system build.

Intel is announcing three new chips in total, and the Core i7-5960X is the cream of the crop. One is called the Core i7-5930K, which runs at 3.5GHz, has a Turbo Boost clock of up to 3.7GHz, and slices the core count from eight to six. Then, there’s the Core i7-5820K, which runs at 3.3GHz, has a Turbo Boost speed of up to 3.6GHz, and also sports six cores. So, if you don’t want to go totally hog wild with the 5960X, there are other options available.

Haswell E Roster
Image used with permission by copyright holder

These new Haswell E chips, including the Intel Core i7-5960X, should be available right now. The 5960X costs a whipping $999, while the 5930K and 5820K will run you $583, and $389, respectively. The 5820K approaches Devil’s Canyon territory from a pricing standpoint. Considering that you can buy an Intel Core i7-4970K Devil’s Canyon CPU for $340 right now, we wonder how the two chips compare from a performance standpoint. For what its worth, the 5820K’s two extra cores probably give it a significant leg up in multi-threaded applications. Then again, it also comes with the added cost of having to upgrade to X99 and DDR4 RAM.

Keep your eyes out for our full Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell E review, which should go live very soon.

Topics
Konrad Krawczyk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen's Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip delivers some performance improvements. Is that true, and is it worth ditching last-gen's flagship for what Intel claims is its best processor?

The Core i9-14900K fixes some of the weaker areas of the Core i9-13900K. However, as you can read in our Intel Core i9-14900K review, the new processor does very little to justify spending a higher price for largely the same performance.
Pricing and availability

Read more
The iPhone 15’s chip challenges Intel’s fastest desktop CPU — but there’s a catch
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Who would have thought that some of the best CPUs would face competition not from a desktop or laptop CPU, but from a mobile system-on-a-chip (SoC)? Well, the latest Geekbench 6 scores prove that it's possible. Apple's new A17 Pro chip, announced during the September 2023 Apple event and found in the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max, challenges AMD and Intel -- but there's a catch.

Yes, it's real. The Geekbench 6 test gives the A17 Pro chip a score of 2,914 in single-core operations, and that's mighty impressive for something that will end up in a smartphone. However, the generational leap is not that impressive -- the last-gen A16 Bionic chip is only around 10% behind in terms of single-threaded performance. The A17 Pro was built based on TSMC's 3nm technology, while the A16 Bionic is a 5nm chip, also made by TSMC.

Read more
Intel Core i5 vs. i7: Which CPU is right for you in 2023?
Intel Core i5-12400F box sitting in front of a gaming PC.

Intel's Core i5 and i7 CPUs continue to be the most popular choice in the realm of processors, and rightfully so. But understanding the distinctions between them is not a straightforward task. Similar to numerous other computer components, there are various models within each tier, which can potentially lead to a somewhat overwhelming selection process.

We're here to break down all the differences between Intel's Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, both on desktop and mobile. They're closer than they were in previous years, and rumor has it that the naming scheme will be replaced outright later this year. But for now, it's still an important comparison to wrap your mind around if you're in the market.
Intel Core i5 vs i7: what’s the difference?

Read more