Skip to main content

Intel to Officially Unveil Core i7 CPUs

Intel to Officially Unveil Core i7 CPUs

Today is the day that chipmaker Intel formally launches its Core i7, a.ka. "Nehalem"—line of CPUs, at an event in San Francisco. The move formally makes the processors available to the public—and, of course, system manufacturers will be quickly be announcing their new i7 systems to get a jump on the market. The first systems to be launched will be at the high end of the market, targeting gamers, although Core i7 systems should appear shortly for mid-range and multimedia-focused systems.

Originally announced in March 2008—and formally named Core i7 last August—the new processors are specifically designed to improve performance of multithreaded applications like multimedia and games, as compared to the current spate of Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Extreme, and Core 2 Quad processors. The Core i7s will sport between two to eight cores, and require a new motherboard and chipset, since they include support for DDR3-1333 memory right on the chip. The chips feature 8 MB of onboard cache and a new QPI interface that replaces the front-side bus. The Core i7 CPUs are rated to consume a maximum of 130 Watts, while the Core i7 Extreme can pull as much as 150 Watts.

Recommended Videos

Intel plans to introduce three quad-core Core i7 processors at launch: a 2.6 GHz Core i7-920, the 2.93 GHz Core i7-940, and the 3.2 Ghz Core i7 Extreme 965, priced at $284, $563, and $999 respectively…and those prices are just for the processors when purchased in lots of 1,000 units.

Performance benchmarks for the Core i7 processors have already been published, and general indications are that the Core i7 line offers raw performance improvements between 15 and 20 percent over earlier Core 2 Extreme processors. The benefits of the processor’s hyperthreading technology, however, can’t be seen until applications operate five or more threads; early specs indicate the Core i7 performs well when applications spawn eight or more simultaneous threads.

In the meantime, if you’re wondering what name is dancing through the minds of the hard-core gamers on your list like sugar plums this holiday season, it’s likely "Core i7."

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
5 CPUs you should buy instead of the Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K socketed into a motherboard.

The Core Ultra 9 285K arrived with a thud. It's an interesting, and sometimes very impressive, processor, but it's not necessarily a good one. Stacked up against some of the best processors, the Core Ultra 9 285K struggles in gaming and even falls behind in critical productivity apps, which isn't a great start for Intel's latest generation.

Thankfully, there are some excellent alternatives. I've reviewed just about every CPU that Intel and AMD have released in the past several generations, and I've rounded up five processors that match, and often beat, the Core Ultra 9 285K -- sometimes even for a lower price.
Core i9-14900K

Read more
AMD vs. Intel: which makes the best CPUs?
Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.

When it comes to desktop and laptop processors, the two biggest names in town are Intel and AMD. Qualcomm is making inroads, but if you want peak performance, Intel and AMD make the best processors for gaming and serious productivity.

Still, it's not all sunshine and rainbows for these industry titans. AMD's most recent Ryzen 9000 CPUs were met with a lukewarm reception, but then Intel's Core Ultra 200-series were even less impressive. It may be up to X3D CPUs and turbo modes to save the day.

Read more
I tested the Core Ultra 9 285K against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — and it’s ugly
Fingers holding an Intel 285K.

Intel's new Core Ultra 9 285K is finally here, promising a boost in performance with a significant reduction in power requirements, at least according to Intel. As you can read in my Core Ultra 9 285K review, Intel's performance claims aren't as rosy as reality, especially when stacked up against what is unequivocally the best processor for gaming you can buy: AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

I threw both processors on the test bench to pit them head-to-head, looking at performance across productivity and gaming apps, as well as thermals and efficiency. These CPUs target different users, but there are still a lot of interesting comparisons we can look at between them.
Specs

Read more