Skip to main content

Intel’s Goliath dominates David at CES

Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are few narratives tech journalists love more than a good David-and-Goliath story. Many of today’s most important technologies and companies were born from humble beginnings before growing into the giants we know today. The Internet was the baby of dedicated researches, Apple grew out of a garage, and Google was founded by a pair of graduate students. Technology wouldn’t be where it is today without the power of new technology that seems to spring from nowhere to overthrow the existing establishment.

But sometimes Goliath is too smart to kill with a slingshot. Such is the case with Intel. Though lacking major announcements, the world’s largest chip manufacturer looks as buff and clever as ever.

Recommended Videos

The last half-decade has thrown two problems at Intel. First, the company was caught by the rise of mobile with its pants down and had nothing to offer while that market took off. Second, the company’s traditional market has stalled and prices have dropped. Both issues are dire – failing to address either could cause Intel to enter a death spiral.

Yet it hasn’t. Though the company’s 2012 earnings failed to exceed its record-setting 2011 figures, the company continues to turn a strong profit with one of the best gross margins in the industry. Intel’s products in the PC market solidly defeat those from AMD on nearly every level, sales of high-margin ultrabooks are slowly but steadily increasing, and the company’s fabs remain the most advanced in the world.

Influence is one reason for Intel’s resilience. Amid its CES 2013 announcements the company slipped in a bomb – ultrabooks based on Intel’s 4th generation processors will require touch and Intel Wireless Display. The company tried last year to wrestle power from hardware manufactures with the ultrabook, but no one was sure if the OEMs would roll over. They have. Companies like Acer and Toshiba happily informed us that they plan to add touch to all thin-and-light laptops to make sure they qualify for the ultrabook label.

That is a big win for Intel. If the company can decide what features exist in consumer laptops, it also can make sure those features help the company’s bottom line. OEMs can be nudged towards extras that require or run best on Intel hardware. The company will have to worry less about the pace of innovation because it can dictate what innovation will be.

Intel’s incredible ability to engineer new architectures has also helped to keep the company strong. Though initially slow to react to the mobile revolution, the company has responded with blistering speed. Last year’s CES saw the introduction of an x86 reference platform for mobile, which successfully attracted a number of hardware partners throughout 2012. Intel has reinforced that endeavor with a road-map that includes two product lines aimed directly at smartphones and tablets.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

That’s only one fork of Intel’s attack. The other comes from the traditional Core products that have successfully dropped to a power envelop of 13 watts (Intel claimed 7 watts, but the company also changed its measurement metric). We’ll likely see a further reduction in power with the release of Haswell later this year.

If you’re unconvinced by specifications, take a look at the products. Lenovo’s ThinkPad Helix, which is powered by a Core i5 or i7 processor, weighs 1.8 pounds in tablet mode. Other detachable ultrabooks are similarly light. Products like this will compel consumers to ask why they should buy an ARM tablet if their Windows convertible can fill the same role.

Perhaps the best evidence in favor of Intel’s strength in mobile is Windows RT’s no-show at CES. We expected to see a fair number of devices with the new operating system. Instead there was deafening silence. Hardware OEMs repeatedly boasted that their tablets run “full Windows” rather than the stripped-down RT.

New technology can create a wave of creative destruction. That wave is unstoppable – but it can be delayed or channeled. Intel has successfully leveraged its influence over the last year to keep its mainstream computing products relevant while the company invests in technology for the mobile market. Should Intel manage to also become a significant force in mobile, well, that’s game over. No competitor has the resources necessary to compete with Intel’s blistering product cadence once it has established a foothold.

CES 2013 demonstrated that Intel remains influential and is making major advancements in its only area of weakness. Don’t let the lack of a headline-grabbing new architecture full you. This was a strong show for the company, and the year will likely follow suite.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
AMD may completely dominate CES 2025
AMD presenting its new Turin CPUs.

AMD might really go all-out during CES 2025 this January. According to a known leaker on the Chiphell forums, AMD is readying a slew of consumer products, ranging from more X3D desktop CPUs to handheld chips and RDNA 4 graphics cards. Here's what we have to look forward to.

The tantalizing bit of gossip comes from Zhangzhonghao, a leaker who's been known to discuss new releases ahead of time. Starting with laptops, AMD is reportedly set to release next-gen Kraken (or "Krackan" as referred to by this leaker) Point APUs alongside Ryzen AI Max (or Strix Halo) and, lastly, Fire Range CPUs.

Read more
Not this again: Intel Arrow Lake may have instability issues
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's Arrow Lake is just a couple of days from hitting the market, and we've been inundated with various reports and leaked benchmarks. Today's news doesn't sound good, though. YouTuber Moore's Law Is Dead reports that Arrow Lake, also referred to as Core Ultra 200-S, may have some instability issues -- much like what we've seen Intel battle for months on end with Raptor Lake.

Before we dive in, keep in mind that all of this is yet to be confirmed, and we're mere days away from finding out whether it's true or not. However, it could give some buyers a reason to hold off and read the reviews before preordering the CPUs. Moore's Law Is Dead talked about various reviewers and tech YouTubers who had something bad to say about Arrow Lake's stability. The issues are twofold: A wild discrepancy between benchmarks, and running into crashes.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more