Judge Orders The Beatles Off BlueBeat

By Geoff Duncan November 6, 2009

Image used with permission by copyright holder

A federal judge has ordered BlueBeat.com stop selling tracks from The Beatles and other EMI artists pending a hearing in EMI’s copyright infringement lawsuit against the site and its parent company, Media Rights Technologies.

EMI filed suit against BlueBeat earlier this week, claiming the company had no right to offer music from the Beatles and other EMI artists online—The Beatles in particular have famously withheld their material from digital distribution, and yet BlueBeat was somehow putting it on offer for $0.25 per track.

Recommended Videos

BlueBeat did respond to EMI’s lawsuit…but industry watchers are still scratching their heads at what the company thinks it’s doing. BlueBeat apparently believes it is selling completely original sound recordings produced by “psycho-acoustic simulation” and—furthermore—that BlueBeat, not EMI, actually owns the copyrights to the material. BlueBeat also asserts that since it embedded images in the digital downloads they become new works to which it can claim copyright.

Federal judge John Walker seemed to take a dim view of BlueBeat’s assertions, noting that incorporating a copyrighted recording into an audiovisual work does not invalidate the original copyright.

The restraining order will be in place until November 20, when the judge will hold a hearing to determine whether the injunction should remain in place until a copyright infringement trial gets underway.

Topics

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

The best VR headsets for 2024

Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Computing

How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it

The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Computing

AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel

A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.