Skip to main content

Leaked Intel Alder Lake benchmark shows AMD might still be in the lead

A new entry in the Puget Systems benchmark database revealed an early sample of Intel’s upcoming Alder Lake Core i9-12900K, along with an Asus ROG Strix motherboard sporting the new Z690 chipset. The results show the early sample outpacing last-gen’s Core i9-11900K, but falling short of AMD’s Ryzen 9 5950X.

The benchmarks have been removed from the database, but Wccftech claims to have snapped screenshots of the results. The tester appears to have run three trials in PugetBench for After Effects, which tests tracking, rendering, RAM previews, and GPU power in After Effects. The Core i9-12900K averaged an overall score of 1563.

Results from Puget Systems database for Core i9-12900K.
Wccftech

A similarly configured Ryzen 9 5950X rig managed an overall score of 1581, beating out the Core i9-12900K in the tracking and RAM preview scores. Meanwhile, an almost identical machine sporting a Core i9-11900K earned an overall score of 1548.

Recommended Videos

This isn’t the performance we were expecting, especially after a couple of splashy rumors claiming massive gains for Intel with Alder Lake. This is only a single benchmark, however, and PugetBench for After Effects isn’t the best benchmark for comparing processor performance. It’s more concerned with the GPU, and all three of the rigs mentioned above were tested with an Nvidia RTX 3090, which explains the largely similar scores.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

In June, Alder Lake showed up in the GeekBench database, which tests the CPU more directly. However, even in this case, the tester ran GeekBench’s OpenCL test for graphics, not the test for processor performance. Even with a growing list of leaks and rumors, this result from the Puget System database is the closest we’ve seen to a real Alder Lake benchmark.

And right now, AMD’s Ryzen 9 5950X is still winning. However, it’s not entirely a fair battle. Alder Lake uses a hybrid architecture that combines performance (P) cores and efficient (E) cores to improve multithreaded performance and increase efficiency when power matters. This design hinges on a feature called Thread Director, which assigns tasks to cores based on which cores will provide the most benefit.

A Thread Director demonstration.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It sounds like a crucial feature for Alder Lake, and one that, according to Intel, will provide noticeable performance increases across applications. Thread Director likely isn’t available on this early sample, and it’s a feature that will provide the most benefit to Windows 11. Once those pieces are in place, the Core i9-12900K might perform better.

It’s important to underline here that these tests used an early version of the Core i9-12900K. We’re not sure what kind of sample it was, but it was not a final retail version. Intel says it can use up to 16 cores (eight P-cores, eight E-cores) and 24 threads with Alder Lake, which are likely the specs of the Core i9-12900K.

Although these results were done with an early sample, the Alder Lake release date is getting close. Intel has confirmed time and again that Alder Lake is set to launch by the end of 2021, and there aren’t a lot of months left. An astute guess points to the processors launching at Intel’s Innovation event, which runs from October 27 to 28, but Intel hasn’t confirmed anything. Hopefully, we’ll see some clearer benchmarks there.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
What’s the best CPU under $400? Here are Intel and AMD’s best options
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

If you want a powerful processor, you can get a lot for your money at around the $400 mark. Both AMD and Intel have stellar options that offer high performance in gaming and productivity, and that even compete with the very best of the best that cost hundreds of dollars more. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Core i7-14700K have lots of cores, super-high clock speeds, and boatloads of cache. Here's how they stack up in a classic head-to-head comparison of the best CPUs under $400.
Pricing and availability
AMD launched the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in April 2023, just over six months after the debut of the rest of the Zen 4 generation of processors. It debuted with a price tag of $450, though that initially fell to $400, then to around $370, which is the price at most retailers at the time of this writing. Stock remains widely available, despite it being one of the most popular processors available today.

 

Read more
Intel 14th-gen Meteor Lake: everything you need to know
On-package memory on Intel Meteor Lake processors.

Intel's 14th-gen Meteor Lake processors are here, and they're ready to compete against some of the best processors for laptops. While they don't currently -- and may never -- have desktop counterparts, Meteor Lake chips bring improved graphics performance, AI capabilities, and high core counts to thin and light laptops.

What's new in Meteor Lake, and what will these CPUs excel at? With Intel's announcement, we now know the answers to those questions.
Pricing and release date

Read more
Intel said AMD’s Ryzen 7000 is snake oil
AMD CEO Lisa Su holding an APU chip.

In what is one of the most bizarrely aggressive pieces of marketing material I've seen, Intel compared AMD's Ryzen 7000 mobile chips to snake oil. Over the weekend, Intel posted its Core Truths playbook, which lays out how AMD's mobile processor naming scheme misleads customers. The presentation has since been deleted, according to The Verge.

There's an element of truth to that, which I'll get to in a moment, but first, the playbook, which was first spotted by VideoCardz. Intel starts with claiming that there's a "long history of selling half-truths to unsuspecting customers" alongside images of a snake oil salesman and a suspicious used car seller. This sets up a comparison between the Ryzen 5 7520U and the Core i5-1335U. Intel's chip is 83% faster, according to the presentation, due to the older architecture that AMD's part uses.

Read more