Skip to main content

The performance downgrade made to the M4 Pro that no one is talking about

Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.
Chris Hagan / Digital Trends

I’ve spent this whole week testing the new M4 chip, specifically the M4 Pro in both the Mac mini and 16-inch MacBook Pro. They are fantastic, impressive chips, but in my testing, I noticed something pretty surprising about the way they run that I haven’t seen others talk much about. I’m talking about the pretty significant change Apple made in this generation to power modes.

First off, Apple has extended the different power modes to the “Pro” level chips for the first time, having kept it as an exclusive for Max in the past. The three power modes, found in System Settings, are the following: Low Power, Automatic, and High Power. The interesting thing, however, is that in my testing, the Low Power drops performance far more this time around.

Recommended Videos
Low Power Automatic High Power
Cinebench R24 (single-core) 154 166 178
Cinebench R24 (multi-core) 765 1622 1707
Cinebench R24 (GPU) 6039 9222 9294

The scores shown above came from on the M4 Pro Mac mini in Cinebench R24. The difference between modes in single-core is closer to what I’d expect, and closer to what they’ve been in previous generations. We’re looking at a 13% higher score for the High Power mode than the Low Power mode.

Multi-core is where things get wild though. With the M4 Pro, you can see just how big of a disparity there is when running the system in Low Power. This Mac mini is 55% faster in High Power than in Low Power. That’s not much higher than the scores we see on the base M3 or M1 Pro chips. This massive drop in performance is also present on the M4 Pro MacBook Pro.

For comparison’s sake, I ran this same test on the previous-gen M3 Max MacBook Pro. There, the High Power mode is only 33% faster in multi-core performance than in Low Power. In fact, although the M4 Pro gets an 8% faster score in multi-core than the M3 Max in High Power mode, the M3 Max is actually 27% faster in Low Power mode.

Someone using a MacBook Pro at a desk.
Chris Hagan / Digital Trends

Of course, this won’t cause any wonky performance changes for most people, since Automatic is the default mode, and Apple has kept the performance scaling between Automatic and High Power modes unchanged.

I also haven’t tested the M4 Max yet, so it’s possible that Apple the lower performance in the Low Power mode is exclusive to the M4 Pro. Maybe it’s exclusive to the “Pro” chips.

One possible explanation could be to optimize the efficiency curve. In order to stay at a reasonable power budget in Low Power mode, Apple may have needed to clamp down the cores, which would explain why the impact is so much stronger on multi-core than on single-core.

I’ll be curious to see when I eventually get my hands on an M4 Max. Apple doesn’t seem to have distributed many M4 Max units for review, so very few have been tested so far.

The other question that remains is whether that Low Power mode extends battery life in the MacBook Pro more than it did in the past. Apple claims that these new M4 chips get extra battery life over their predecessors, but didn’t explain where that extended life came from. The size of the batteries hasn’t changed over the previous generation, after all.

If it’s true that the more restricted Low Power mode was turned on during battery life testing, it could result in some extra battery life that wasn’t there before. That might sound like Apple would be fudging the numbers a bit to increase battery life claims, but in the experience of the user, that might not matter. So long as they know that when they’re on battery and using Low Power mode, they’re getting less than half the performance out of the M4 Pro.

Luke Larsen
Luke Larsen is the Senior Editor of Computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
5 laptops to buy instead of the M4 MacBook Pro
The Dell XPS 14 and MacBook Pro side by side on a white desk.

The M4 MacBook Pro is pretty stellar. Apple made it far better than the previous generation -- without increasing the cost. That includes bumping up the memory of the base configuration to 16GB, improving the webcam, and unlocking the max brightness of the screen.

But maybe you don't love macOS. Or maybe you're just an Apple hater. Either way, I feel ya. Fortunately, there are some good choices these days that make for a solid alternative to the M4 MacBook Pro.

Read more
MacBook Pro 16 vs. MacBook Pro 14: here’s which M4 you should buy
The MacBook Pro 16-inch on a table.

MacBook Pros are some of the best laptops money can buy. With the M4 chip now onboard, these laptops have never been so powerful, and the update brings some interesting upgrades, such as the improved 12-megapixel webcam and brighter screen. They're the best MacBooks that have ever been made, and it's a perfect time to pick one up based on upgrade timing.

But just because the entire MacBook Pro lineup is better now, that doesn't mean it's any easier to choose between the two size options that are available. Despite the fact that they include many of the same features, the 14-inch MacBook Pro and 16-inch MacBook Pro feel like entirely different systems due to their contrast in size.

Read more
Apple hid one of the best features of the M4 MacBook Pro
Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.

Apple's new M4 MacBook Pro is great. It earned a rare Editors' Choice badge in our M4 MacBook Pro review, and it's cemented itself as one of the best laptops you can buy. Even with so much going for it, Apple hid one of the most exciting developments it made with its new range of laptops -- the use of quantum dot technology.

Like the last few generations of MacBook Pro displays, the M4 range is using a mini-LED backlight. There's no tandem OLED like we saw on the iPad Pro earlier this year. However, according to Ross Young, CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC), Apple added a layer of quantum dots to the M4 MacBook Pro. This, according to the display expert, offers better color gamut and motion performance compared to the solution Apple previously used.

Read more