Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Developers: Making apps for M1 Macs ‘couldn’t have been easier’

 

Apple’s new M1 MacBooks have captured the attention – and enthusiasm – of Mac users in a way that has not been seen for years. We are now talking about Macs not in terms of how premium they look or feel, but primarily how their Apple Silicon processors trounce the competition. The performance is the main talking point. For a company previously so reliant on Intel’s patchy reliability, that is a huge shift.

Recommended Videos

But a transition this significant requires more than just enthusiasm. It needs serious developer support. Emulation through Rosetta 2 is just fine, but Apple’s goal is to convince as many developers as possible to optimize their apps for the M1 architecture. From directly ported iOS apps to Mac Catalyst, Apple has made a number of resources available to smooth the transition, but just how good are these programs at helping out developers? To find out, I spoke to the designers of some of the Mac’s biggest apps to get their take on the situation.

Simplifying the transition

Image used with permission by copyright holder

When making a change as monumental as Apple’s switch to its own custom processors – complete with a totally new architecture – it is essential that developers are not presented with a bewildering process to get their apps ready. If they are, the M1 Mac ecosystem may stutter and get off to a much slower start than expected, with fewer apps available as developers struggle to adjust.

Fortunately, all the developers we spoke to said the process was incredibly easy – and that is good news for the future of the Mac. Ken Case, CEO of The Omni Group and publisher of productivity apps like OmniFocus and OmniGraffle, said building apps for M1 Macs “couldn’t have been easier.”

James Thomson, whose popular PCalc app has been on Macs for nearly 30 years, concurred with this sentiment.

“I’ve been through all of Apple’s previous processor transitions with PCalc, and this was by far the easiest,” said Thomson. “In fact, it took me less time to add support for Apple Silicon and have a working universal app than it took to uncompress the copy of Xcode I built it with.”

iOS apps are made for touch surfaces and will still need Mac-specific features.

Key to this simplicity was the similarity between developing for Intel and Apple Silicon processors. Both Case and Thomson said the process was almost identical.

Ash Hewson is the managing director at Serif and responsible for apps that have won numerous Apple Design awards. He explained that Serif has always avoided relying on Intel-specific components in its apps and has focused on developing for the iPad – which also uses Apple-designed processors – meaning it was able to develop for the M1 without a hitch.

Considering the ease of developing for Apple’s new chips, should you expect your favorite apps to come out sooner? And given that M1 Macs will be able to natively run iOS apps, will that mean less development time? That is unlikely, the developers said. As several pointed out, iOS apps are made for touch surfaces and will need Mac-specific features (like mouse and multi-window support) to make them enjoyable experiences on Apple’s computers. Those features take time to build into apps.

Instead, the primary benefits lie in the newfound power these apps will put at your fingertips.

More power, more features

Apple One More Thing Event Tim Cook
Image used with permission by copyright holder

All the developers I spoke to were adamant that the M1 chips – and whatever Apple follows them up with – will bring benefits to Mac fans, particularly in the form of even more powerful Mac apps.

Simonas Bastys, lead developer at photo-editing app Pixelmator told me that the M1 chip’s Unified Memory Architecture, which allows internal components to share memory and thus reduce the costs of passing data between them, results in “big performance improvements.”

“This was simply not possible on Intel Macs,” Bastys told me. “The architecture there is completely different and involves moving data between the GPU, CPU, and RAM.”

What sort of app performance improvements are we talking about here? Hewson provided an enlightening example: In some cases, Serif apps perform 10 times faster on an M1 MacBook than on a souped-up 16-inch MacBook Pro, one of Apple’s most powerful consumer machines.

The Mac is back with a vengeance.

Both Thomson and Bastys explained that the hardware advancements of the M1 will allow apps to do things that just were not possible on older Macs, with more features and more power at their disposal. If you get an M1-powered Mac, not only will you have a much more powerful machine than Apple could previously offer, but the apps you run on it could come with features that simply were not feasible before.

That is good news for Mac users. In speaking with developers, it seems clear that Apple has taken pains to ensure developers have been able to translate the performance gains of the new M1 Macs into apps that come loaded with more power and more features.

It is a far cry from the situation just a few years ago, when the Mac felt neglected and unloved, in the shadow of its much more popular iPhone cousin. Today, the Mac is back with a vengeance. If you love your Mac apps, it’s never been a better time to be locked into the Apple ecosystem.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
Apple hid one of the best features of the M4 MacBook Pro
Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.

Apple's new M4 MacBook Pro is great. It earned a rare Editors' Choice badge in our M4 MacBook Pro review, and it's cemented itself as one of the best laptops you can buy. Even with so much going for it, Apple hid one of the most exciting developments it made with its new range of laptops -- the use of quantum dot technology.

Like the last few generations of MacBook Pro displays, the M4 range is using a mini-LED backlight. There's no tandem OLED like we saw on the iPad Pro earlier this year. However, according to Ross Young, CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC), Apple added a layer of quantum dots to the M4 MacBook Pro. This, according to the display expert, offers better color gamut and motion performance compared to the solution Apple previously used.

Read more
With the M4 here, there are two Macs you now shouldn’t buy
The Mac mini up on its side on a desk.

The M4 chip update for the Mac was quite a shakeup. Apple simultaneously introduced the M4 Pro and M4 Max, while also bumping RAM across the starting configurations of the new Mac mini and MacBook Pro. All in all, these are great changes that have sweetened the deal on these new M4 products.

But all the changes in the lineup have left two Macs completely in the cold -- and until they get updated, you shouldn't buy them.
Mac Studio (M2 Ultra)

Read more
The performance downgrade made to the M4 Pro that no one is talking about
Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.

I've spent this whole week testing the new M4 chip, specifically the M4 Pro in both the Mac mini and 16-inch MacBook Pro. They are fantastic, impressive chips, but in my testing, I noticed something pretty surprising about the way they run that I haven't seen others talk much about. I'm talking about the pretty significant change Apple made in this generation to power modes.

First off, Apple has extended the different power modes to the "Pro" level chips for the first time, having kept it as an exclusive for Max in the past. The three power modes, found in System Settings, are the following: Low Power, Automatic, and High Power. The interesting thing, however, is that in my testing, the Low Power drops performance far more this time around.

Read more