Skip to main content

Microsoft Partners with OpenX for Free Ad-serving

OpenX_LogoIn an effort to shave market share from Google, Microsoft is using OpenX’s open source technology to offer publishers free ad-serving technology for their websites.

As part of the multi-year agreement, Microsoft will get access to a major distribution channel through OpenX’s community of more than 150,000 websites that serve more than 300 billion ads each month. OpenX will be the preferred partner for Microsoft’s enterprise ad-serving business and will also promote Microsoft’s Content Ads.

Recommended Videos

Content Ads match ads to relevant editorial content allowing advertisers to increase campaign effectiveness and achieve a higher yield on certain types of inventory.Most of the software developed by OpenX is based on open source technology. The independent ad server for Web publishers offers its community of publishers comprehensive, customizable and free-to-use ad serving technology.

OpenX, founded in 1998, is run by British-born ex-Yahoo executive Tim Cadogan. Cadogan previously ran global advertising marketplaces at Yahoo. He says the company tries to do two things. “We try and provide a technology platform for all kinds of businesses to run advertising on their websites, that’s Part 1,” he says. “And Part 2 is we’re also trying to help publishers connect to revenue sources that can make them money from their advertising.”

He explained the technology platform connects to the way OpenX provides and introduces publishers to revenue services and “the partnership kind of maps pretty closely to those two goals.”There are really two components to the Microsoft partnership, according to Cadogan: there’s an ad serving aspect and a monetization side.”We have more than 50,000 publishers actively using OpenX ad serving products and so that is a very large pool of potential customers for the Microsoft Content Ad  product, which those publishers can then put on their pages and hopefully generate more revenue from,” Cadogan says. “We are pretty excited about it and very optimistic about what we can do in the future,” he says. The news comes more than a year after

Microsoft and OpenX started a trial in which OpenX invited its publishers to test the product.Cadogan made clear the way the company looks at the world is that all those big players are providing potentially valuable revenue sources to publishers.”So to give you an example, Google Ad Sense is a very important product for a lot of publishers, many of the publishers that use the OpenX Ad Server are using AdSense as one of the revenue sources to put ads on their pages,” he says. “We want to be able to do an ever better job of letting publishers get access to more choices and then be able to control those choices in a way that works best for them. So we view ourselves as almost somewhat of an intermediary between the publishers and all of these big companies on the monetization side of things.”

An earlier DMB story, Google Gets Into Ad Swapping, said the DoubleClick Ad Exchange has been well received by buyers and sellers in the digital ad market. The Ad Exchange incorporates elements from Google programs AdWords and AdSense and will feature enhancements like real-time bidding and a new application programming interface (API) designed specifically for ad networks.

Google says its Content Network reaches more than 80 percent of global Internet users and serves more than 6 billion ad impressions each day across hundreds of thousands of websites. Google’s DoubleClick ad server is OpenX’s main rival.In 2009 interactive marketers will be charged more than ever with proving their online budgets, driving sales or moving the needle on key brand metrics. Interactive marketers will start to pin accurate measurement metrics to a broad array of tactics, including emerging media, according to a Forrester Research report.

Despite a predicted online advertising growth rate of 12 percent, offline budgets will decline in 2009 and interactive marketers of all types will be pressured to squeeze as much as possible from their online spend. “Many marketers will do some soul searching and find that they are not using their current tool set to its full potential, nor are they leveraging publisher relationships as well as they could be,” Emily Riley, Forrester analyst, wrote in the report.

According to Forrester, consumers will digest media cross devices, not just across sites. Microsoft with its device heritage and Google per its experiments with alternative platforms hold an advantage while Yahoo! with its declining ad business and disjointed customer experience across channels will be at a disadvantage, the report stated.

Dena Cassella
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Haole built. O'ahu grown
Google Sheets vs. Microsoft Excel: Which is better?
Microsoft's PowerPoint on the Vision Pro.

Workplace visualization tools make the world go round, and will definitely liven up your before-lunch presentation. If you’ve got hard numbers to display to the masses, or graph-scribed projections you’re eager to get onscreen, you’ll need a powerful spreadsheet. You can use Google Sheets, or you can use Microsoft Excel -- they're both great ways to get the job done. But which of these two platforms is truly the best option? That depends on a number of things, and we’re not here to dissuade or encourage, but merely to inform.

We actually love Google Sheets and Excel, but for different reasons. One software may not be ideal for A, B, and C, although it may be really good at D, E, and F. Whatever the case may be, we put together this comparison of Google Sheets and Excel, with focus paid to essential categories like application access, data analysis, and charts and graphs. 
The basics
It’s worth stating from the start that both Sheets and Excel are excellent spreadsheet applications. So if you have the opportunity to try them both out, you may have a clear preference from the start. But if you’re doing your research first, just know that you can’t go wrong with either.

Read more
A new definition of ‘open source’ could spell trouble for Big AI
Meta AI can generate images within a chat in about five seconds.

The Open Source Initiative (OSI), self-proclaimed steward of the open source definition, the most widely used standard for open-source software, announced an update to what constitutes an "open source AI" on Thursday. The new wording could now exclude models from industry heavyweights like Meta and Google.

"Open Source has demonstrated that massive benefits accrue to everyone after removing the barriers to learning, using, sharing, and improving software systems," the OSI wrote in a recent blog post. "For AI, society needs the same essential freedoms of Open Source to enable AI developers, deployers, and end users to enjoy those same benefits."

Read more
Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs
A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.

Read more