Skip to main content

Should the Oculus Rift have a better lens? Microsoft seems to think so

microsoft says its vr lenses are better than the rifts oculusvs
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The honeymoon period in Oculus’ virtual reality marriage is well and truly over. The company helped pioneer the latest run at virtual reality technology, and it looks like this time it might become popular enough to find its stride. But there is growing competition from companies that think they can do VR better. Take Microsoft, which is now claiming to have produced a lens that is better than those used in the DK2 rift headset.

The lens purportedly restricts the field of view a little more, but provide much greater focus, making it “sharper across the field.” It also uses far less chromatic aberration, according to the developers.

Recommended Videos

In a number of comparison images taken from the Tuscany house demo that comes bundled with the Oculus Rift drivers, it’s clear that the lenses do indeed create a much sharper, clearer image. There is a downside to that, though. Due to the type of display used in the DK2 headset and its relatively low resolution compared to more contemporary headsets, the crisper image makes the screen door effect much worse.

Related: Oculus shows off the consumer-ready rift and a new controller

It would be interesting to see if a combination of these lenses and some of the diffusers that people have used to smudge out the pixel lines would be a comfortable compromise.

AssemblyDiagram
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Regardless though, the lenses are quite easily accessible and the housing for them can actually be made with a 3D printer. Microsoft Research put the CAD files online, so a commercial printer can be used, or a home one if needed – though Microsoft does warn that the finer parts may not be reproduced accurately on lower quality systems.

The only downside is that the lenses, which must be purchased from a third party, are not cheap. Each ‘lens’ actually requires two separate lenses, which together cost almost $200 per eye. This makes the entire set up even more expensive than the original headset.

This may be why Oculus didn’t use similar lenses for the DK2, as it is aiming for a cost effective consumer headset. When the CV1 launches early next year, however, it will feature custom optics that are vastly improved over that used in the development kit HMDs.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more