Skip to main content

New Oculus Rift teardown prices total component cost at just $206

oculus rift teardown pricing oculusteardown01
IHS Markit
There was a large, albeit temporary storm that formed around the time of the Oculus Rift pricing announcement. The $600 price was far more than the $350 “ballpark” that company founder Palmer Luckey had once quoted, but the argument was a solid one: This sort of cutting-edge tech costs a lot of money. Plus, Oculus was basically selling it at cost, we were told.

However, a new teardown from IHS Markit suggests that manufacturing the Oculus Rift is far cheaper than we were led to believe. In fact, it could be as cheap as $206 per headset, suggesting Oculus VR turned a nice profit on each sale.

Recommended Videos

The teardown is a detailed one, pricing individual chips used on each PCB based on costs straight from the official manufacturers. It covers everything from a small 64MB of flash memory, which contributed 64 cents to the overall build cost, to the two Samsung AMOLED panels used to provide the 2,160 x 1,200 resolution display, which cost just shy of $70.

Related: Oculus Rift ATV simulator is more than just a crazy video game — it could actually save lives

Clearly, Oculus shopped around for its hardware. The Rift uses components from many companies, domestic and foreign, so parts cost was a major concern for the developers. It’s not like you can chalk all of the discrepancy up to manufacturing costs, either, as IHS’ teardown factors that in, too. It also prices the wireless remote and the Xbox One controller, which incidentally are said to cost Oculus around $24.

So if the Rift was so much cheaper to put together than officially claimed, why did we end up paying upward of $600 for them?

RoadToVR brings up a few key points that IHS Markit appears to have missed. For starters, for such a detailed teardown, it’s surprising that IHS appears to have entirely forgotten about the custom fresnel lenses used in the Rift’s creation. We were told before the Rift’s release that they were custom-made, which would suggest a higher than usual cost for them.

It’s also been pointed out that the breakdown doesn’t mention the potential cost for software development to go along with the Rift, nor the years of research and development that went into its creation.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more