Skip to main content

Ozone Smog Review

Ozone Smog
“Ozone’s inexpensive Smog gaming mouse imitates the likes of Logitech and Razer, but lacks refinement.”
Pros
  • Highly configurable
  • Comfortable for palm grip mousing
  • Inexpensive
  • Flashy LED-lit design
Cons
  • Mediocre build quality
  • Glitchy software
  • Ceramic feet drag at low speeds
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Introduction

Is there any less appropriate name for a product in the green-crazed marketplace of 2010 than the Ozone Smog? Unless some other hapless company is marketing a mouse known as the Barbaric PuppySlayer, we think not. Unfortunate product name aside, the Smog gaming mouse from Spanish upstart Ozone sets its sights squarely on the likes of Logitech and Razer by offering a full-featured gaming mouse at a price more in line with these competitors’ entry-level offerings.

Recommended Videos

Note: Australia’s Cyber Snipa and Ace of Sweden sell nearly identical mice, indicating the Smog uses a generic design tweaked and rebadged for different manufacturers.

Features

Like any gaming mouse worth its salt, the Smog comes with an array of buttons, widgets and gizmos intended to translate every twitch of your mouse to sudden death for some unfortunate virtual adversary.

Between the usual right and left mouse buttons, you’ll find shield-shaped “lift” and “mode” buttons. The lift button allows you to calibrate your mouse for your mousing surface, while the mode button is your shifter between one of seven – yes, seven – different sets of programmed controls. There’s also a scroll button that can be clicked left and right for side scrolling, and thumb-operated back and forward buttons.

An LED panel above the thumbrest indicates one of four sensitivity levels, while a switch rear of the thumb lets gamers flip through them on the fly. An obscure fifth LED indicates which of the seven programmed modes are active at any given time, and color coordinates with two mini glowing LED “headlights” and a solid LED bar on the heel of the mouse.

On the right, two swappable sides let you customize where your ring and pinky fingers will end up: either piled on top of each other on a steep cliff of a side, or resting individually on carved, ergonomic ledges. With the side removed, you can eject a cassette full of six 5-gram weights, which can be added or removed as necessary to give the mouse proper weight, or lack thereof. The entire body glides on five shiny ceramic feet.

Design

A gloss black body with red buttons breaks no barriers for gaming mouse color schemes, but Ozone keeps it simple and relatively clean. The left-side thumb rest has been plastered over with a textured rubber patch for grip, while the swappable right-hand grips have both been cast from matte ABS plastic. Wary as we are of obnoxious LED underglow, the Smog’s ebbing LED heartbeat actually grew on us quite a bit.

The Smog feels put together solidly enough, but not quite up to par with class leaders like Logitech and Razer. Some of the buttons, including the left- and right-click buttons, seemed to have a little too much of a springboard action to them, and we definitely would have preferred matte materials to the gloss Ozone ended up choosing for most of the Smog.

Testing and Usage

When it comes to mousing, two schools of thought divide the gaming populace: claw grip and palm grip. While palm grippers engulf the mouse in the hand and push it around with wrist and forearm action, claw grippers use their fingertips to finesse it around below the hand, without as much contact.

The Smog has clearly been built for the palm grip. Every inch of hand mates up with corresponding plastic curved to shape. To our smallish hands, it fit like a glove, and larger-handed folks reported no issues. The ledged side grip, especially, left every finger cradled. Unfortunately, we’re more claw grippers, so this isn’t our preferred way of doing business.

The slippery ceramic feet on the bottom of the Smog work wonders for moving it around. When sliding it around in one constant, fluid motion, it almost feels as if it’s riding on ball bearings. Unfortunately, they also seemed to produce quite a bit of static friction – the clingy force you have to break when two objects in contact with each other sit at rest. It’s what keeps a hockey puck, for instance, from sliding down a concrete ramp, and what keeps the Smog from feeling precise when making tiny, minute adjustments. The ceramic feet glide as if on ice when mousing from one edge of the desktop to the other, but try to position a cursor between two letters in Microsoft Word – or crosshairs on your opponent’s head in Call of Duty – and it gets finicky. The mouse begins to stick when you move it too slowly, then when you give it more force to compensate, it starts to skim more easily across the desktop and you end up overshooting. There’s a reason the vast majority of mice out there use plastic or Teflon “skates,” and as far as we’re concerned, this is it.

Turning down the sensitivity to the second level and using a cloth mouse pad helped compensate, but ultimately, we never felt the same feeling of precision we’re used to from even basic plastic-footed mouse.

The DPI slider located below the thumb makes it technically possible to switch between different sensitivities on the fly, but we you’ll need to totally remove your thumb from the grip to do it, or clumsily actuate it with your thumb joint. Either one feels too clumsy to use in the heat of combat.

Ozone’s custom gaming software made it relatively easy to build and assign custom macros to different buttons – and even divide them into profiles, but it also suffered from some graphical glitches in Windows XP that left us guessing as to the function of certain buttons until we learned the ropes. We weren’t even able to adjust the DPI levels for the four different sensitivity settings properly, or close it without learning to hover over an invisible X in the corner.

Conclusion

Despite a decent go at knocking off the known leaders of the precision mousing game, Ozone’s Smog can’t quite hide its off-brand character. A plasticky body, annoying ceramic feet and glitchy software all give it a slightly unpolished feel that justify its rather low 35 Euro street price (about $47 USD). For gamers who want features on a budget, it may be worth putting up with its quirks, but those who seek the Heckler & Koch of computerized fragging should look further up the price range.

Highs:

Highly configurable

Comfortable for palm grip mousing

Inexpensive

Flashy LED-lit design

Lows:

Mediocre build quality

Glitchy software

Ceramic feet drag at low speeds

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
12 best processors for work and gaming in 2024: CPUs tested and reviewed
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D installed in a motherboard.

AMD and Intel have fought for supremacy for decades, duking it out in a bid to make the best processors you can buy. The competition is fierce, and that's a great thing for PC enthusiasts. In 2024, the list of the best CPUs is larger than ever and packed with options from Team Red and Team Blue.

The bang-for-buck king is the Ryzen 9600X, but its last-gen 7600 counterpart is still worth considering. At the top end, for gaming we have the incredible new 9800X3D and the 9950X for productivity, while Intel's new 285K has found its own limited niche for fans of Team Blue.

Read more