Skip to main content

Palin’s supporters abuse Wikipedia to justify Paul Revere gaffe

via boingboingFollowing in the footsteps of Bill & Ted or Marty McFly, Sarah Palin supporters have decided to change the past and they’re using Wikipedia as their flux capacitor.

Last week the former Alaskan governor made an inaccurate comment about Paul Revere’s iconic ride through Boston. According to her, Paul Revere rode and rang his bell, proclaiming to the British that the colonials were ready to fight. However, the accurate version involves a midnight run to warn the colonists in Massachusetts that the British were coming. His mission was also a secret one (like a ninja), though Longfellow can make it seem like it was a loud message.

Recommended Videos

When confronted about her mistake, she tried to wave it away by calling it a “gotcha question”. She also tried holding on stubbornly to the idea that she was a little bit right, telling Fox News, “I didn’t mess up about Paul Revere. Part of his ride was to warn the British that we’re already there-that…you are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have.”

ReadWriteWeb points out that she was right about the words, but she was confused about when Revere said them. Revere did tell the ‘Regulars’ America was ready to fight, but it was not the same event as his ride. He was captured by the British at the time, with guns point at him—not on horseback.

Charles Johnson over at littlegreenfootballs noted that her followers’ “blind dedication” has led them to edit the Wikipedia page for Paul Revere to make it seem as if her comments were justified. This has began a back and forth of revising for the Wikipedia page. At many points, the revision history announces: “Beware Tea Party editors placing dubious language to support Sarah Palin’s revision of American History”.

Not to worry though, Head of Wikipedia Communications Jay Walsh assures us that the article is now in semi-protection and can only be changed by those with older registered accounts.

Jeff Hughes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a SF Bay Area-based writer/ninja that loves anything geek, tech, comic, social media or gaming-related.
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more