Skip to main content

Roll your own maps: Mapbox wants to become the Wikipedia of cartography

mapbox
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Open-source software is not a new concept, but it remains a revolutionary one. We’ve seen it rise steadily over the years with programs like Mozilla Firefox and Wikipedia, built-on the backs of benevolent volunteers and patrons who seemingly desire nothing more than to share their relentless passion for creating new frontiers of knowledge and industry. Yet, despite all the fanfare associated with renowned open-source kings like the aforementioned Wikipedia and Firefox, other software is skirting in the mainstream market: open-source mapping.

MapBox has a simple, yet daunting, goal: to build a better map.

The open-source mapping movement is bigger than you might think, burgeoning with underground tenacity and drive that feeds the user-generated machine. Digital map publishers, like Washington, D.C.-based startup
Recommended Videos
MapBox, offer a more customizable alternative to mainstays like Google or Bing Maps that primarily provide its users with professionally curated content and navigation. Not only is MapBox one of the crowd-sourcing pioneers working to build a better breed of map, it’s actually doing it right and making a difference in the open-source mapping space.

The small, 30-person MapBox team has been working out of a garage, building mapping software using a combination of privately-purchased satellite data and open data from NASA, as well as a free user-maintained world map called OpenStreetMap. The collaborative project works in a similar fashion to Wikipedia – it can essentially be edited by anyone free of charge – allowing the software to be altered, updated, and user fact-checked on the fly for greater speed, convenience, and customization. 

OSM Screenshot
Image used with permission by copyright holder

OSM allows its users, which are over a million strong, to access the data in its raw form and alter it directly without restrictions. If Google Maps never included that winding dirt road that leads back to your house in the boonies for example, there’s a good chance it never will. However, if the road was left out in OSM, you could manually use the software to edit the map, easily outlining the contours of the road and adding details that would otherwise remain stagnant in other mapping software. Adding and outlining businesses, neighborhoods, and other notable points of interest works in a similar fashion.

MapBox has a simple, yet daunting, goal: to build a better map.

The company may be less than three years old, but MapBox is already designing and publishing custom maps based on open-source data, creating a ripple effect within the mapping community and powering some of the most widely-adopted apps and visual projects to date. Foursquare, the social networking-based mobile “check-in” app, and Evernote, the popular note-taking software suite, both utilize the MapBox platform.

map_box_foursquare
Foursquare uses MapBox Streets global street-level map, which is based on OpenStreetMap data. Image used with permission by copyright holder

Foursquare users know that when they’re using the service, be it via the Web or on a mobile device, they’re not looking at a Google Map. Foursquare’s map definitely has a distinct look to it, which can be attributed to MapBox’s custom work. Foursquare teamed up with MapBox to use MapBox Streets, a global block-level map powered by OSM. Evernote 5 for Mac also uses a customized version of MapBox Streets to display users’ geocoded notes in the app’s Atlas view.

NPR is another proud MapBox client. NPR’s Digital Media team uses TileMill, another open-source project created by MapBox, which acts a design studio that lets users create stunning interactive maps using custom data. In NPR’s case, it uses TileMill and U.S. Census data to create beautiful maps of population change down to the tract level.

NPR used MapBox's TileMill project to map population growth based on the 2010 U.S. Census data.
NPR used MapBox’s TileMill project to map population growth based on the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census data. Image used with permission by copyright holder

The list of top-name clients using MapBox instead of Google Maps goes on and includes Hipmunk, Le Monde, the Guardian, the Federal Communications Commission, and USA Today. The platform essentially provides a canvass for tinkering and tailoring maps to suite a particular company’s product and overall aesthetics without relying on the rigid structure of larger mapping players.

It’s a bold idea, relying on a sea of volunteer cartographers to build a comprehensive map, but it’s one that is starting to prove worthwhile as the mapping winds continue to shift. Not only did Foursquare ditch Google Maps last year, but so did Wikipedia and Apple (horrendously we might add), adopting aspects of OSM and incorporating open-source data directly into their native apps. Even Craigslist hopped on the open-source band wagon when it decided to begin optionally embedding maps into certain ad posts last summer.

One of the largest French papers, LeMonde, recently launched a slew of interactive French maps based on MapBox Streets.
One of the largest French papers, Le Monde, recently launched a slew of interactive French maps based on MapBox Streets. Image used with permission by copyright holder

Though these companies are all using MapBox’s services and products, which range from $5 to $499 a month, it’s also available to anyone to use for free. Albeit the free version only gives you 3,000 map views a month and 50MB of upload storage (the $499 Premium option gives you 1 million map views a month and 30+GB of upload storage, among other things), it’s still a way for anyone to create their own custom styled maps.

Despite major software improvements and infrastructure upgrades – MapBox is currently working on implementing a new OSM called iD Editor – co-founder and CEO Eric Gundersen sees the active user community as the most crucial aspect of open-source mapping. “Every day the map is growing, the world is huge,” said Gundersen. “The key thing about OSM is we are part of it. The most valuable aspect of it is not the map or the data – it’s the community that curates it.”

Brandon Widder
Brandon Widder is a multimedia journalist and a staff writer for Digital Trends where he covers technology news, how-to…
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more
M4 vs. M3: How much better are Apple’s latest chips?
An official rendering of the Apple M4 chip.

Apple has begun outfitting its Macs with the M4 chip, following the chip’s debut in the iPad Pro in spring 2024. But not every Mac comes with the M4 -- several are still sporting the previous-generation M3, which offers impressive performance in its own right. These devices are expected to make the switch over the coming months.

That means there’s a split between M3 Macs and their M4 siblings, and the big question is whether you should upgrade. Is the M4 a large upgrade over the M3, or will you be fine sticking with the older chip? What sort of performance do the M3 and M4 offer, and how do they work under the hood? We’ve analyzed all the similarities and differences so that you know exactly what you should buy.
Where can you find these chips?

Read more