Skip to main content

Seagate Backup Plus Ultra Slim 2TB review

Seagate's tiny Ultra Slim external hard drive is both pocketable and affordable

Seagate Backup Plus Ultra Slim 2TB HD box
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends
Seagate Backup Plus Ultra Slim 2TB
MSRP $129.99
“Lightweight and tiny, the Seagate Ultra Slim lets you carry 2TB of data with you anywhere.”
Pros
  • 2TB of portable storage for $100
  • Extremely thin and light
  • USB 3.0 compatible
  • Has NTFS drivers for Mac compatibility
Cons
  • Can be loud during disk access
  • Modest warranty

It is staggering how fast hard drive storage is evolving. A decade ago, most people had never heard of a terabyte. Now, 2TB drives aren’t uncommon. And they’ve become small enough to fit in your pocket. Seagate’s new Ultra Slim line shows just how dense data storage can be, and does so at a reasonable price — a mere $100 for 2TB, and $70 for 1TB.

Recommended Videos

There are cheaper drives with the same amount of storage, but Seagate is hoping the drive’s form factor and design will help make up the difference. Is the company right? We grabbed a 2TB silver model to find out.

Slim and sturdy

Are we allowed to call a hard drive cute? Because this thing is tiny, and has dimples.

The metal plate on top, available in silver and gold color aluminum, is covered in an alternating series of indented bubbles. Not much breaks this pattern up, save for an indicator light and a logo in opposite corner dimples. The bottom and the sides, meanwhile, are a single piece of lightweight plastic. None of the material feels tough, but it does the job well enough.

Can a hard drive be cute? Because this thing is tiny, and has dimples.

Seagate calls this an “ultra slim” drive, and that’s not an exaggeration. The unit is only .38 inches thick, which is downright tiny for a mechanical hard drive in an enclosure. The already-thin Western Digital My Passport Slim is .49 inches thick, by way of comparison, and that was about the thinnest device on the market until now. The other dimensions are standard: 4.47 inches long, 2.99 inches wide, which is about the size of every portable drive on the market at this point. All told this hard drive is likely smaller than your phone, and at 4.8 ounces it probably weighs a little less too.

The included cable connects over USB 3.0, with the standard type-A connector on one side and a type-B micro connector on the other. At 15 inches long, it’ll work for most scenarios, but you may need a different cord if you don’t plan to rest the drive on top of your desktop.

If we have one criticism of this drive, it’s the sound. When you plug in the Seagate, you’ll hear that it’s on, thanks to the extremely thin case. It’s not too obnoxious, but its slight hum is audible in a quiet room.

Fast as a mechanical drive can be

Despite its small form factor, the Seagate Ultra Slim has a traditional, mechanical hard drive inside. Does cramming moving parts into a small case compromise speed?

Apparently not, if our CrystalDiskMark sequential tests are anything to go by. Over USB 3.0 we saw a read speed of 130.8 megabytes per second, and a write speed of 129.8MBps. That’s about the fastest speed you can expect from an external mechanical hard drive, and is in fact nearly identical to the speeds we saw from LaCie’s Porsche Design. It’s also similar to internal mechanical hard drives we’ve tested, though there are faster models.

Seagate Backup Plus Ultra Slim 2TB HD box
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

Our HD Tune benchmark, which runs a longer file transfer, gave us lower numbers. We saw a read speed of 91MBps, an access time 12.4ms, and a write speed 94.9MBps. These figures are mediocre, but not unusual for a compact mechanical drive.

Given the speed limitations of a mechanical drive, you might be wondering if USB 3.0 is even worthwhile. Our answer – yes! Over USB 2.0 this drive offers a read speed of 41.1MBps, and a write speed of 42.8MBps. That’s considerably slower, so do make sure you plug this drive into a USB 3.0 port whenever possible.

Are there faster USB 3.0 drives out there? Yes, but most are SSDs. The Samsung T3 portable SSD, for example, offers read speeds of 422MBps, and a write speed of 393MBps. But that speed comes at a price — $850 for 2TB.

Product registration, NTFS drivers for Mac

Mac users will be pleased to have access to NTFS drivers for Mac, free of charge, meaning Mac users can write to the drive even if it’s formatted for Windows. Western Digital does not offer this software with its comparably priced hard drives.

Seagate also offers a backup program offered for Windows users, called Seagate Backup. It seems to do its job, but we’re doubtful most users will prefer it over other free or paid backup solutions.

Two-year warranty

Seagate offers a two-year warranty for its hard drive. One year warranties are more typical, so this is generous, especially given the low price point of the drives themselves. But Seagate’s main competitor, Western Digital, offers a three-year warranty on many of its external drives.

A solid little drive with good performance

If you want a physically small external drive that’s big on space, and at a competitive price point, you could do worse than Seagate’s Ultra Slim. There are cheaper drives out there, but not with this form factor. And seeing as no mechanical drive can offer anything resembling a speed advantage in the USB 3.0 era, form factor and price are the main things you should be considering.

The thin case does a poor job of silencing the drive’s hard disk.

You can find heavier and bulkier drives for $10 to $20 cheaper. The Western Digital My Passport Ultra-Portable, for example, sells for $90 with 2TB of storage, and comes with a three-year warranty. That combination of lower price point and warranty coverage means it’s well worth considering, but Seagate’s Ultra Slim is both smaller and lighter.

You could also look at a more “premium” drive, like the LaCie Porsche Design, but it’s bigger, heavier, and $50 more expensive (because it’s named after a car). If you want extreme speed, you could look into an external SSD like the Samsung T3, but at nearly eight times the price you’d better absolutely need that performance.

For most people, Seagate’s Ultra Slim is a great value in a tiny form factor. We recommend it if you need a basic, yet extremely portable, external drive.

Justin Pot
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Justin's always had a passion for trying out new software, asking questions, and explaining things – tech journalism is the…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more