Skip to main content

New tape drive with 220TB capacity smashes storage records

IBM Research Sets New Record for Tape Storage
Every PC enthusiast has a memory of their first hard drive. For some it’s 80GB, for others, 800MB and some of you can no doubt go back far further to drives measured in kilobytes. Today, we’re blessed with multi-terabyte storage solutions for under $100 – what a treat! But hard drives aren’t necessarily the be all and end all of high-capacity data storage, as IBM has recently proved by creating the world’s densest data platform; a new tape drive!

In collaboration with Fujifilm, IBM has broken the storage record by producing a single tape cartridge that has such dense data storage, it can hold up to 220 terabytes of data. That’s thanks to its ability to handle as much as 100 gigabits of data for every square inch of tape.

Recommended Videos

Even the most impressive of RAID set ups have to feel inadequate next to that.

According to the two firms, this was made possible with what they call Nanocubic technology, which while sounding like a B movie science-fiction, is actually rather complicated. It “decreases barium ferrite (BaFe) magnetic particle volume,” without fluctuating the temperature too much and thereby preserves the longevity of the storage medium. It also uses “enhanced write field head technology,” which is necessary in order to handle the miniaturized BaFe particles.

What all of this means is that, as it invariably does, high volume storage just became smaller once again. Considering how much more information we’re all storing in the cloud, this could become a massively important technology for many cloud service providers around the world, though due to its extreme capacity and particular format, it seems unlikely to be appealing to home users.

How big is your local storage? Something tells us it won’t be quite as impressive as this.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
The best VR headsets for 2024
Fionna Ahomuoh using the Meta Quest 3 VR headset.

Virtual reality is finally crossing a threshold when everyone should be taking a closer look. As the number of VR headsets increases, getting the best one is important so you can truly appreciate what's possible. The challenge is finding the system that's right for you at a price you feel comfortable with.

Meta, HTC Vive, Sony, and Pimax stand out as the most popular and most active virtual reality brands. There's little doubt the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro is an impressive mixed-reality headset. However, there are plenty of other XR and VR headsets that are much more affordable than the Vision Pro and deliver a great, immersive experience for gaming, 3D movies, and even productivity. It's a good idea to check out all the options, and we've collected the very best here to make it easy to find the perfect VR headset for you.

Read more
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more