Skip to main content

Intel, move over — this may be the most powerful CPU ever

Tachyum has just announced the Prodigy T16128 Universal Processor, a CPU that comes with 128 cores and a whole lot of computing power.

Although you won’t be able to install it inside your desktop PC, it may be a serious competitor for Intel in the high-performance computing (HPC) arena.

A view inside a dark data center.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The specifications of Tachyum’s Prodigy CPU are truly mind-boggling. The flagship variant comes with 128 64-bit CPU cores that can hit speeds of up to 5.7GHz. It also comes with 16 DDR5 memory controllers and 64 PCIe 5.0 lanes. As can be seen from the specs, this is a processor you may find in places that require high-performance computing.

Recommended Videos

According to Tachyum, Prodigy is the first “universal processor” in the world. It can tackle A.I. and machine learning workloads alongside various other computing tasks, and we truly mean the most taxing tasks you can imagine — after all, it wasn’t made so monstrously powerful for nothing.

While it sounds impressive on paper, Intel and Nvidia both have their own HPC offerings that can do the job. But Tachyum seems convinced that it made something far better. It stands out by being an all-in-one kind of chip that can run all manner of tasks, but it’s a lot more power-conservative than its rivals and seems to have been produced at a much lower cost.

As reported by Tom’s Hardware, Tachyum promises to deliver performance that’s up to four times better than the Intel Xeon 8470 as well as triple the performance of Nvidia’s H100 in HPC workloads. This kind of performance is made possible by the chip’s innovative architecture.

Most server hardware made by Tachyum’s well-known competitors, such as Nvidia, Intel, and AMD, is focused on performing individual tasks with little overlap. Simply put, each little block has its own task, and data has to be transferred from one block to the next in order for everything to function. Tachyum took a different approach with the Prodigy and it will be capable of running all kinds of resource-heavy workloads within a single chip on individual cores.

Intel Xeon silicon.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The ability to multitask to such an extent without relying on other hardware is nothing short of impressive, and given the allegedly low pricing of the server chip, it could really break new ground and rival Intel processors in a major way. Toning down the power consumption in comparison to Intel also equals a lower cost to use Tachyum, not just to buy it. After all, this means that companies may be able to pack more of these chips, increasing their capabilities.

The top chip in the lineup is said to be able to perform 12 A.I. PetaFLOPs and 90 TeraFLOPs worth of HPC workloads. Tom’s Hardware compares this to Nvidia’s A100, and the results are undeniable — the A100 maxes out at 5 A.1. PetaFLOPs.

Tachyum Prodigy was built from scratch with matrix and vector processing capabilities. As a result, it can support an impressive range of different data types, such as FP64, FP32, BF16, FP8, and TF32. It also comes with 128MB of combined L2 and L3 cache. We know that it features a 5nm process node, but we do not know the source.

This beastly CPU range will also be available in a 64-core and 32-core variant, but the launch is not happening just yet. Production is set to begin in 2023.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
Intel is bringing back one of its most frustrating types of CPUs
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

Intel's new Arrow Lake CPUs are a big deal. They utilize an entirely new architecture and come with a new socket, which will help them compete for a spot among the best processors. However, it looks like some upcoming Core 200-series CPUs (the non-Ultra versions) might not use the Arrow Lake/Lunar Lake architecture at all -- they might be rebranded CPUs sporting older CPU tech.

The assumption comes from results in the Crossmark benchmark that were posted to Bapco and first pointed out by Everest on X (formerly Twitter). The result shows the Core 5 210H, but it's not the performance that's interesting. It's the specs. The result shows that the CPU comes with eight cores and 12 threads. That's the rub. Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake don't come with Hyper-Threading, so each core only comes with a single thread.

Read more
AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D may not give Intel any breathing room
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D installed in a motherboard.

The competition between Intel Arrow Lake and AMD Zen 5 hasn't been as fierce as usual, with both lineups delivering small gen-to-gen improvements. However, it seems that AMD may soon add a staple to its list of the best processors, and the CPU might be announced at the worst possible time for Intel. I'm talking about the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which now has a rumored release date alongside some performance benchmarks.

The release date speculation was initially shared on Bilibili, but the user has since deleted their post. However, the discussion continued on Chiphell forums, spilling the beans on both the official announcement date and the possible release date.

Read more
Intel’s upcoming high-end CPU failed to beat AMD
An Intel Core Ultra Series 2 chip embedded in a piece of glass.

If various reports are anything to go by, Intel is about to expand its share of the best processors with the upcoming Arrow Lake. As a result, benchmark leaks are almost a daily occurrence at this point. While the flagship Core Ultra 9 285K is mostly doing a good job against its AMD competitors, the non-K version failed to beat the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and the Intel Core 9 14900.

The Core Ultra 9 285 appeared in a Geekbench 6 test, first shared by Benchleaks, and the scores are nothing to write home about. The processor scored 3,081 points in the single-core test, which is fairly competitive, and a measly 14,150 points in the multi-core benchmark, which is disappointing. In fact, while the single-core test went better, both of these scores put it firmly behind many CPUs that we'd expect it to be able to beat.

Read more