Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Why this two-year-old GPU is still the one you should buy

The AMD RX 6700 XT sitting on a table.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends

Since Nvidia and AMD announced their next-gen GPUs, budget PC builders have been waiting with bated breath to see what the companies could deliver in the midrange sweet spot of $300 to $400. Unfortunately, the answer hasn’t been pretty.

Nvidia’s RTX 4060 Ti launched to near-universal dissatisfaction, while AMD’s RX 7600, although a decent GPU, carried a lot of caveats. Even Nvidia’s value-focused RTX 4060 failed to impress, largely due to the fact that it’s beaten by last-gen options around the same price.

Recommended Videos

And around all of these GPU launches, there has been one card at the center: AMD’s RX 6700 XT. Launched more than two years ago, it was an impressive GPU that was mostly overlooked due to the fact that it arrived in the midst of a GPU shortage. That’s not to mention the fact it was overpriced to begin with, as AMD (and Nvidia) capitalized on the insatiable demand for GPUs during that time.

RX 6700 XT graphics card installed in computer.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

That dust has settled now, however, and prices have gone down. Without a ton of options in the midrange from Nvidia and AMD, the RX 6700 XT has slowly become the crowning jewel of the $300 to $400 price point, and there are a few key reasons why.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

First, its raw performance. The RX 6700 XT was supposed to trade blows with Nvidia’s RTX 3070. It doesn’t. Nvidia’s GPU is faster. That math changes with how the pricing is for the RX 6700 XT now, though. You can find the card for as low as $320, along with its juiced-up sibling the RX 6750 XT for around $360.

1440p gaming performance for the RTX 4060.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

At that price, the RX 6700 XT looks much more attractive. As you can see above, it’s around the same level as last-gen’s RTX 3060 Ti, beating out the RTX 4060 for around the same price. It’s not quite as fast as the RTX 4060 Ti, but it’s also a lot cheaper.

Now, I don’t want to leave Nvidia out in the cold here. The RTX 3060 Ti has seen some price drops as of late, as well, and you can find it for around $330. Most models run closer to $350, but it’s still a great option at that price. It even has an edge over the RX 6700 XT in some areas. It’s faster with games that support ray tracing and it unlocks Nvidia’s excellent Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS).

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The RX 6700 XT still has some unique advantages, though. Overall, the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6700 XT are evenly matched, but that includes games with ray tracing. Take ray tracing out of the mix, and AMD’s GPU takes the lead. Take Resident Evil 4 as 1440p as an example. The RX 6700 XT is 11% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti, nearly matching the RTX 4060 Ti.

And in Forza Horizon 5, the RX 6700 XT is not only 20% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti, it even manages to beat the RTX 4060 Ti. This jump isn’t universal across games. In Cyberpunk 2077, for example, the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3060 Ti are evenly matched, while in Returnal and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the RX 6700 XT is only a few frames ahead.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The RX 6700 XT excels with its raw, rasterized performance now that prices have dropped. If you want ray tracing, however, the RTX 3060 Ti still has an edge, even if that means giving up some performance in other games. In Cyberpunk 2077, for instance, the RX 6700 XT can’t maintain 30 frames per second (fps) while the RTX 3060 Ti pushes near 40 fps, and that’s before turning DLSS on.

There’s another pro in the RX 6700 XT’s camp, though: 12GB of VRAM. We’ve seen more and more over the past year how games are stressing the amount of VRAM on GPUs, and the RX 6700 XT comes out on top in that battle. Resident Evil 4 is a prime example. A big reason why the RX 6700 XT is able to stretch its legs in that title is that it requires a lot of VRAM, allowing it to claim a clear lead over the RTX 3060 Ti.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Similarly, in The Last of Us Part One, the extra VRAM helps the RX 6700 XT claim a 12% lead over the RTX 3060 Ti (along with a massive 22% jump over the RTX 4060 Ti due to that GPU’s constrained memory interface).

Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are a lot of games where VRAM isn’t a concern, and in those titles, the RX 6700 XT matches or slightly exceeds the RTX 3060 Ti without ray tracing. However, we’ve seen enough games that stress VRAM this year alone to call it a legitimate concern. There are half a dozen titles released this year that have run into VRAM problems, and there will likely be more in the future. The RX 6700 XT is better equipped to handle those games than any of the current-gen options from AMD and Nvidia.

I don’t want to leave this saying the RX 6700 XT is the best graphics card for everyone. If you’re looking at the cutting-edge like Cyberpunk 2077‘s path tracing mode, Nvidia still has a massive lead. Unfortunately, in this generation, that usually means sacrificing performance in other games, which is why the RX 6700 XT has become the de facto recommendation for budget-minded gamers, despite the fact that it’s two years old.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Brace yourself for PC hardware to get insanely expensive next year
The Hyte Y40 PC case sitting on a table.

None of us like higher prices, but that's exactly what we could be in for next year.

I'm going to be analyzing the impact of Donald Trump's proposed tariffs on the price of PC hardware in the future, using not only some estimates that are available now, but also the historical context of tariffs during Trump's first administration. My point is not to say anything political in nature, but instead to take a serious look at just how much these tariffs will affect PC hardware pricing.

Read more
Nvidia CEO in 1997: ‘We need to kill Intel’
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang at GTC

Those headline above includes strong words from the maker of the best graphics cards you can buy, and they have extra significance considering where Nvidia sits today in relation to Intel. But in 1997, things were a bit different. The quote comes from the upcoming book The Nvidia Way, written by columnist Tae Kim, and was shared as part of an excerpt ahead of the book's release next month.

The words from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang came as part of an all-hands meeting at the company in 1997 following the launch of the RIVA 128. This was prior to the release of the GeForce 256, when Nvidia finally coined the term "GPU," and it was a precarious time for the new company. Shortly following the release of the RIVA 128, Intel launched its own i740, which came with an 8MB frame buffer. The RIVA 128 came with only a 4MB frame buffer.

Read more
Nvidia may keep producing one RTX 40 GPU, and it’s not the one we want
The Alienware m16 R2 on a white desk.

The last few weeks brought us a slew of rumors about Nvidia potentially sunsetting most of the RTX 40-series graphics cards. However, a new update reveals that one GPU might remain in production long after other GPUs are no longer being produced. Unfortunately, it's a GPU that would struggle to rank among Nvidia's best graphics cards. I'm talking about the RTX 4050 -- a card that only appears in laptops.

The scoop comes from a leaker on Weibo and was first spotted by Wccftech. The leaker states that the RTX 4050 is "the only 40-series laptop GPU that Nvidia will continue to supply" after the highly anticipated launch of the RTX 50-series. Unsurprisingly, the tipster also reveals that the fact that both the RTX 4050 and the RTX 5050 will be readily available at the same time will also impact the pricing of the next-gen card.

Read more