Skip to main content

Virtual Reality is ready to launch, but could it crash and burn?

At the 2014 Game Developers Conference, I endured a two-hour wait to play CCP Games’ Eve: Valkyrie on the Oculus Rift for the first time. The experience was unlike anything I’d ever undergone before. I could look above me and, in plain sight, see the soul-sucking emptiness of space. I could look behind, and see that I was pray for an enemy fighter. And I could look below to witness massive starships battle like savage beasts. Never before had I felt so immersed in a game — or any other media.
Recommended Videos

Virtual reality hasn’t met its most discerning audience, the consumer.

But all was not as it seemed.

After the initial shock of the experience subsided, I began to notice cracks in the virtual world. The resolution wasn’t as sharp as I would have liked. There was also the question of motion sickness. Within minutes, I could suddenly feel a migraine coming on. VR’s potential was clearly incredible, but the drawbacks were equally formidable.

Not worth the headache

Three weeks ago, I sat down to test out Eve: Valkyrie a second time, once on Oculus Rift, and then on Sony’s forthcoming PlayStation VR. The game was stacked with a bunch of new features and modes, prettier than before, and I was able to compete with a room full of people. But despite being upgraded to a 1080p resolution, it still looks rough.

Whether that’s a limitation of the hardware or the software is up for debate, but after reaching out to Eve: Valkyrie‘s lead designer himself, Andrew Willans, it’s my contention that Oculus Rift is to blame.

IMG_2851
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Without even asking about the resolution issues I’ve experienced with the Rift, Willans volunteered that from a UI design perspective, one of the developer’s “bigger challenges was adapting to the ever increasing resolution of the HMD displays. Finding the sweet spot at which text can be read clearly.”

From the information Willans offered me, optimization was a huge focus for CCP in its production of the Rift’s flagship title. Unfortunately, even with Oculus’ work on upping the resolution, floating text on the head-mounted display was hard to read. It looked like I was staring at an old console game, a foot away from a TV screen.

And my ongoing quarrel with VR-induced motion sickness continued. At GDC, I was only allowed a few minutes with the Oculus Rift, and I’d already begun to feel symptoms of nausea. My private LAN party with CCP was a much longer experience, clocking in at about an hour. By the end of our session, I was burdened with excruciating pain in both my head and stomach that lasted me the rest of the day.

Oculus Rift, and VR as a whole, has a long, rutted road ahead of it. It still hasn’t met its most discerning audience, the consumer.

VR could still fail commercially, for the same reasons as stereoscopic 3D before it. It requires a specific set of hardware. It’s wearable technology that many are unfamiliar with. It’s expensive. Developers like CCP and Sony must communicate why playing games on a headset is, and that’s a challenge.

Alt-gaming

According to Andrew Willans, VR may meet that challenge by side-stepping it. He doesn’t view VR as a direct competitor to traditional games and media enjoyed on a flat screen, but instead as a compliment best suited for new experiences.

Eve: Valkyrie was built from the ground up for VR, so in terms of game design we had a good idea of what features we wanted to include,” Willans told me. “The real challenge then comes down to implementation and testing within VR.”

s_HsfT9pq0zaYEMPsHLCMfsej_l0xfIvJaEEtwicj34
Eve: Valkyrie doesn’t look nearly this good with the headset on. Image used with permission by copyright holder

He informed me that, in developing the flagship Oculus Rift launch title, certain game modes simply won’t work in a VR environment. Eve: Valkyrie‘s “Control,” for example, is a traditional capture-the-flag mode that, in any conventional first person shooter, might harvest a few campers along the way. VR, on the other hand, is about exploration and the opportunity to experience new worlds. For Eve, this means being on the move constantly.

VR’s potential was clearly incredible, but the drawbacks were equally formidable.

“Our game is all about the fluidity of aerial combat,” Willans told me. “The last thing we wanted was for players to simply park up in space and wait for the action to come to them.”

Eve: Valkyrie tries to solve this problem by letting players deploy drones near certain objectives to do the camping in their place. Meanwhile, the players themselves get to continue engaging in fast-paced action combat. The fact that an integral slice of the game had to be modified in order to fit the standards of VR means Oculus Rift won’t be replacing our current gaming setups any time soon.

Virtual reality must prove its worth

If anything, VR is a supplement for an already established, nearly $100 billion gaming enterprise. Even so, major technical achievements are needed to ensure virtual reality is worth the price.

At this year’s PlayStation Experience, I waited in a three-hour line to try out Eve: Valkyrie once again, this time on PlayStation VR. The result as disappointing as with the Rift. Edges on nearby ships and HUD text were murky. Everything around me looked like an aliased image propelled directly off a Star Wars holo-projector.

Both Oculus Rift and PlayStation VR are set to be released in the next few months. Not much will change between now and “Q1 2016.” If there was ever a time to be concerned about the state of these two platforms as proof of concept to the consumer, that time is now.

Gabe Carey
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A freelancer for Digital Trends, Gabe Carey has been covering the intersection of video games and technology since he was 16…
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more