Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

A Florida pastor asked ChatGPT if he was okay. It nearly got him killed.

When "just relax and recover" turns out to be the worst medical advice you could get.

Add as a preferred source on Google
ChatGPT on iPhone
Rachit Agarwal / Digital Trends

Scott Winters, a pastor from Florida, is suing OpenAI after ChatGPT allegedly gave him what his lawsuit calls “extremely dangerous” medical advice, advice that nearly cost him his life.

What happened to the pastor?

For weeks, Winters turned to ChatGPT with questions about recurring dizzy spells and unstable blood pressure. Instead of pointing him toward a doctor, the bot reassured him his symptoms weren’t serious enough to worry about and told him his “careful recliner-based micro-recovery” was working just fine.

Recommended Videos

Winters followed that advice. But the calm reassurance was hiding a real emergency, a pulmonary embolism caused by blood clots in both lungs. Doctors later told him that his immobility, the exact thing ChatGPT recommended, is what pushed him to the brink of death.

As Cybernews first reported, things took an even stranger turn once OpenAI rolled out cross-chat memory in 2025. ChatGPT reportedly began weaving religious language into its responses, apparently because it knew Winters was a pastor, at one point calling his recovery “a form of worship.”

Six weeks of symptoms, brushed off as nothing serious, turned into a slow countdown to a medical crisis.

Why is OpenAI being sued?

Winters filed his lawsuit in a California court, accusing OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman of negligence and the unauthorized practice of medicine. He says the fallout cost him his job, his ministry, and his home, on top of nearly costing him his life.

The case is reportedly the first to argue that a general-use chatbot should be held legally responsible for bad medical advice. Winters wants financial damages and is asking the court to pause ChatGPT Health until it’s proven safe.

OpenAI, for its part, told the New York Times that blaming a chatbot alone oversimplifies people’s health decisions. Whatever the court decides, the case is a solid reminder that a confident tone from a chatbot is not the same thing as a medical degree.

I always tell people to never take medical advice from ChatGPT or Google. What irks me here is not the medical advice ChatGPT gave to the pastor but the fact that it didn’t tell him to consult a doctor. This should be a safety net built into all AI chatbots.

Rachit Agarwal
Rachit is a seasoned tech journalist with over ten years of experience covering the consumer technology landscape.
Scientists made robots curious like toddlers, and it helped them learn language twice as fast
Give a robot curiosity, and it starts learning language (and misbehaving) just like a toddler.
robots and kids photo

Scientists have been trying to figure out how kids pick up language so fast for decades, and a new study out of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) might have cracked part of the puzzle: curiosity.

Researchers built a virtual robot with a brain-inspired neural network and set it loose in a simulated 3D world full of shapes, colors, and simple commands like "push left magenta dumbbell." 

Read more
You can now buy a computer mouse controlled entirely by your tongue
Augmental has opened public sales of the MouthPad, and introduced a new wearable that lets you type hands-free.
Augmental MouthPad and Vox featured

Augmental first showed off its tongue-controlled MouthPad as a CES curiosity in 2024. Today, the device is a real product you can buy, with the company opening public US sales alongside a beta release of Vox, a companion wearable built to handle the typing half of Augmental's hands-free computing promise.

A retainer that doubles as a mouse

Read more
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more