Skip to main content

Adidas robots are coming to Atlanta to make your next pair of sneakers

Robots are set to play an increasing role in the production of Adidas running shoes after the company this week revealed more details about plans for its first automated production facility in the U.S.

The sportswear giant started testing its robots earlier this year at a purpose-built “Speedfactory” in its home country of Germany. And now it intends to launch the same cutting-edge facility in Atlanta.

As its name suggests, the technology inside Adidas’s Speedfactory allows it to manufacture goods at a rapid clip, with the regional location helping it to cut down on shipping emissions and get its gear to outlets in a more timely fashion.

Covering an area of more than 74,000 square feet – about 1.5 times that of a football field – the Atlanta facility’s robot army will start churning out footwear toward the end of next year. Adidas says it has a “mid-term aim” to produce around half a million pairs annually, though doesn’t specify how many it wants its bots making once the place is running at full capacity.

“Equipped with cutting-edge manufacturing technologies, the U.S. factory enables Adidas to create products in increasingly high volumes with advanced complexity in color, materials and sizes,” the company said in a release.

The Atlanta operation will employ 160 human workers, presumably to help keep those bots fully functioning.

Addressing concerns that more robot-operated production lines means fewer contracts with the more than 1,000 independent mostly Asia-based “human” factories currently making Adidas products, the company’s head of technology innovation, Gerd Manz, insisted last year that its Speedfactory strategy is a “separate business model” and will therefore complement, rather than replace, existing manufacturers.

With global manufacturing moving toward increased automation, and the World Economic Forum predicting the process will replace some five million jobs in the next four years, it’ll be interesting to see if Manz is still offering the same line come 2020 or whether his voice, perhaps offering a reconsidered perspective, will be drowned out by the sound of thousands of automatons cranking out running shoes at those high-tech Speedfactories.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more