Skip to main content

Alphabet’s Sidewalk Labs wants to help modernize cities across the U.S.

Google promises to improve urban life with Sidewalk Labs
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Sidewalk Labs, the brainchild of Google co-founder Larry Page and subsidiary of the former’s parent company, Alphabet, has its heart and mind set on nothing short of technological utopia. It wants to reduce congestion on crowded thoroughfares, secure a constant supply of parking spaces, ensure power is used and collected efficiently, and ultimately “improve life in cities for everyone,” in the company’s words. On Tuesday, it announced a small but meaningful step toward that idealistic goal: a partnership with advocacy group Transportation For America (T4A) that will see 16 metropolitan cities gain access to the resources necessary to develop ridesharing and self-driving infrastructure.

The list of lucky cities include Boston, Denver, Los Angeles, Seattle, Washington, D.C., Austin, Texas, Chattanooga, Tennessee, Lone Tree, Colorado, Centennial, Colorado, Portland, Oregon, Madison, Wisconsin, Minneapolis / St. Paul, Minnesota, Sacramento, California, San Jose, California, Miami-Dade County, Florida, and Nashville, Tennessee. Most are cities that did not win, or were not eligible for, the the U.S. Department of Transportation’s $40 million Smart City urban revitalization challenge earlier in 2016.

Recommended Videos

Sidewalk Labs will provide the resources necessary to get various “smart city” initiatives off the ground, a spokesperson said. It will cover Transportation For America’s operating costs, initially, and provide “technical assistance” to improve the flow of traffic and transit services. And later down the line, it’ll theoretically ramp up those efforts with the implementation of Flow, a “transportation platform” that uses real-time data to provide commuters with parking and traffic information, identify points of congestion, and suggest the redirection of public transit like trains and buses to human supervisors.

Sidewalk Labs’s chosen cities will likely follow the lead of Colombus, Ohio, the winner of the Department of Transportation’s competition. According to documents unearthed by The Guardian, Sidewalk Labs hopes eventually to deploy vehicles with cameras that would drive around cities to record roadside parking signs and map out public parking locations. It would combine that information with the stream of data supplied by drivers using Google Maps, Google’s navigation app, to indicate which parking spaces are available.

“We will build a platform for ingesting lots of different kinds of data to enable users … to understand the ground truth in real-time,” Daniel Doctoroff, New York City’s former deputy mayor of economic development and rebuilding and CEO of Sidewalk Labs, told The Verge earlier in 2016. “It will be fed essentially into an analytical machine that will enable cities to map assets against demand, create dashboards for transportation, parking, maybe even permitting. And on top of that, we can potentially build applications over time, some of which may be consumer applications.”

The city and their and their residents stand to benefit handsomely. Flow’s algorithms would highlight the most lucrative routes for parking enforcement, which Sidewalk Labs estimates could mean as much as $4 million in added revenue for a medium-sized city. A new parking app would support payments systems like Android Pay and Apple Pay, from which cities would receive one percent of revenue. Residents would be granted unfettered access to more than 100 free Wi-Fi hotspots around the city. And the more than 90,000 low-income transit users who currently rely on bus passes would be provided transportation subsidies on ridesharing services.

The current roadmap has the most of Flow launching by July 2017. Sidewalk Labs has begun “exchanging data” with the city of Columbus in anticipation of the coming rollout.

Not everyone is copacetic with Sidewalk Labs’s plans. According to Recode, the company’s free Wi-Fi kiosks would pack a myriad of sensors and tracking technologies that might make some passersby uncomfortable. Devices that connect will be tracked. The kiosks in question will monitor air quality, bike and pedestrian traffic, street noise, street vibrations, magnetic fields, light spectrum, and even security threats like abandoned packages.

And they would not come free. Around 100 kiosks outfitted with the full array of sensors would cost cities an estimated $4.5 million in the first year. Two 55-inch advertising screens reduce that cost, but only partially — Sidewalk Labs would pocket 50 percent of the profits.

But the the subsidiary is realistic about its prospects. “[It’s] not going to happen at real scale for a while,” Doctoroff told The Verge. “But that doesn’t mean you can’t be putting into place the infrastructure today in order to solve real-world problems like parking, lane changing, and traffic enforcement, where that infrastructure utility you put in today can’t be a critical component of that future view. And so we are beginning to think about things, and actually beginning to build or in some cases acquire products to enable us to get to that place over time.”

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more