Skip to main content

Amazon offers refunds for fake solar eclipse glasses, faces related lawsuit

Amazon faces class-action lawsuit for allowing sale of faulty eclipse glasses

best solar eclipse glasses
123RF/IgorZhuravlov

As one of the decade’s most exciting natural phenomena fast approaches, it would appear that some ne’er-do-wells are attempting to take advantage of the solar eclipse to turn a profit — but at the expense of their customers’ health. As initially reported by the Verge, Amazon has issued refunds for potentially false solar eclipse glasses, because yes, people are awful. And now, the retail giant is facing a class action lawsuit as a result of these transactions.

On August 21, a large swath of the American population was able to watch as the sun disappeared behind the moon. The “Great American Eclipse” marked the first time in 38 years that the nation (or at least, parts of it), was able to watch a total eclipse. But of course, watching such an event requires protective eyewear. And while many people turn to Amazon to buy just about everything they need in their lives, it would appear that the online retail giant has been unable to verify the safety of all the glasses on its site, and that some glasses sold through its site were either counterfeit or unsafe.

Recommended Videos

“Safety is among our highest priorities,” an Amazon spokesperson told TechCrunch. “Out of an abundance of caution, we have proactively reached out to customers and provided refunds for eclipse glasses that may not comply with industry standards. We want customers to buy with confidence anytime they make a purchase on Amazon.com and eclipse glasses sold on Amazon.com are required to comply with the relevant ISO standard.”

Unfortunately, this may have proven too little too late for some customers, who didn’t receive this notice in time. After the eclipse, Corey Payne and his fiancée, Kayla Harris, filed a class action lawsuit against Amazon, claiming that defective eclipse glasses purchased from the online retailer damaged their eyes. The couple purchased a three-pack of glasses from Amazon, and on August 21, looked into the sky to experience the historic eclipse.

But later that day, the couple alleged that they began experiencing headaches and eye watering, and later, developed impaired vision. The couple claimed that they did not receive Amazon’s message regarding the recall of potentially faulty glasses. Amazon has not responded to requests for comment regarding the case.

In addition to providing refunds, Amazon reportedly removed sellers who attempted to peddle unverified eclipse eyewear. If you bought a pair of sunglasses from Amazon for the purposes of watching the eclipse, and neither received a safety warning from the company nor experienced any discomfort post-eclipse, then you can reasonably conclude that the supplier confirmed the product to the ISO compliant. If you think, however, that you have been duped, you can always reach out to Amazon’s customer service for a refund, as promised by the A-to-Z Guarantee — or you can consider joining the class action.

Update: Amazon is facing a class action lawsuit over faulty eclipse glasses.

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more