Skip to main content

Your personality may predict whether you choose a job that gets automated

automation personality traits study i robot screen sonny
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Workers have worried about automation for generations, but with the coming of the “fourth industrial revolution,” circumstances seem more dire now than before. Algorithms are getting smarter, robots are becoming more capable, and humans from the factory to the newsroom are already being replaced with machines.

Interestingly, the best defense against automation may not be a particular skill set, but personality traits, according to a new study. The researchers found that, although education was important, character traits, vocational interests, and intelligence played a major role in determining whether a person will select an easily automated job.

Recommended Videos

“There has been a lot of research in economics recently about the dangers of automation and what it can do to the labor market, but no psychological research had yet examined how individual differences in intelligence, personality traits, and vocational interests predict job computerizability outcomes,” Rodica Damian, lead author of the study and psychologist from the University of Houston, told Digital Trends. “This is important because if we want to enhance workforce readiness — for example, train the new generations to be prepared for the future labor market — we need to know where we must intervene.”

Damian and her team analyzed data on 346,660 people, looking at things like personality traits in adolescence and socioeconomic status over a 50-year period. They found that, regardless of social background, a person was more likely to select a less computerizable job if they displayed higher levels of intelligence, maturity, and extroversion, while being more interested in the arts and sciences.

The results are perhaps not that surprising. After all, intelligence goes hand in hand with higher levels of education, as well as more complex and creative professions that aren’t as easily done by machines. Extroverted people meanwhile tend to select jobs that require more social skills, which chatbots haven’t quite mastered yet.

There are things susceptible people can do to prepare, said Damian, but it could mean changing some pretty fundamental parts of who they are.

“I would try to obtain as high of an education level as possible,” she advised. “I would try to develop complex social interaction skills and leadership, artistic and scientific interests, creativity, and in general a mindset out to solve complex problems and be flexible, a mind that likes to learn constantly.”

The job market will change drastically in the coming decades. It’s not something easily predicted or prepared for, and so the best security may simply be flexibility. Indeed, Damian even admits her study may become outdated as new technologies emerge.

“These results can certainly change if we look forward 50 years,” she said, “because no one knows what technological revolutions await.”

A paper detailing the study was published this week in the European Journal of Personality.

Dyllan Furness
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more