Skip to main content

This iPad on a stick with wheels is officially the creepiest thing at CES

There are plenty of “good” reasons for the Beam “remote presence system” from Suitable Technologies to exist. Too bad it’s also the single strangest, creepiest, and douchiest gadget at CES 2014.

If you haven’t heard of Beam, it’s basically an iPad attached to a 5-foot tall robot with wheels. It is controlled though a desktop app by the person whose face appears on the screen. It has a camera at face level for video conferencing, and another waist-level, wide-angle camera to give the user a view of the ground, lest they run over an unsuspecting foot, cat, or small child.

Beam is a “good” product … in exactly the same way a Segway is a “good” product.

Despite what its booth at CES 2014 might imply, Beam is not new. It first popped onto the scene in 2012, and made a debut showing at last year’s CES. But the company is clearly making a major push this year. You may have seen a video of Beam late last year, as it made its way around Reddit and countless other websites, sparking a resounding “WTF?” from Web users the world over.

In person, Beam is both more and less impressive. After a face-to-machine chat with Arianne, a Suitable rep who spoke from her office in Palo Alto, California, some 540 miles away from the show floor of CES 2014 in Las Vegas, my initial skepticism about Beam had thawed … a little.

According to Arianne, Beam is especially helpful for companies that have offices all over the world. “It’s the easiest and cheapest way to connect,” she said. And that could be true – after you factor in the $16,000 minimum you’ll plunk down on a Beam, a cost that jumps to $20,000 after you factor in chargers and all the other necessary accessories. Indeed, for business people who often travel internationally, I can see how Beam could both save money in the long run and spare the mental drain of travel.

photo

While businesses seem to be the primary target customer for the Beam, Arianne says there are plenty of other people and organizations that have begun to use the contraption. Universities, for example, “are using it for long-distance education,” she said. And hospitals have begun deploying doctors via robot to high-risk patients who are so sick that keeping them quarantined to prevent the spread of disease is a must.

On paper, that all sounds great. And it sounded pretty convincing when Arianne told it to me. She damn near had me sold. But after the glow of a PR chat wore off, I began to think about how using the Beam plays out in real life. Say your boss has a Beam, and randomly decides to zap himself into your office at random times – or even for planned meetings. That guy is a douchebag. I don’t care how practical the Beam is; using it at all is just weird. Want to be at the meeting in London but you’re in New York? Use Skype! Or a phone! Why do you need the ability to roll all around an office you’re not actually in, if not to freak people out?

And it will freak you out. As I tried to inconspicuously snap pictures for this article, Beam-people kept spinning around and rolling up to me. I couldn’t escape their soul-less glare, no matter how hard I tried to stay out of their camera-powered view.

The long-distance learning thing is slightly less offensive to me, for some reason that I can’t quite pin down. But the doctor thing? I mean, Jesus H. Christ, how crappy would you feel about life if you’ve caught some life-threatening disease and the only way people will talk to you is through a freakin’ robot? Blech! Thinking about that just makes me angry.

Still, I get it. Suitable Technologies has created a solution that DOES solve real problems. It represents exactly the kind of tech-fueled future we’ve been talking about for generations. So it is a “good” product … in exactly the same way a Segway is a “good” product: Only the world’s biggest assclowns will actually want to use one.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more