Skip to main content

Behold, the $40,000 Hoverbike

Hoverbike
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Is it a bird? A plane? Nope — it’s a freakin’ Hoverbike! This kick-ass aircraft (above) comes courtesy of Australian inventor Chris Malloy, who has been building the futuristic flying contraption for the past two-and-a-half years, in his garage, during off-hours. And Malloy says he’s just a year away from launching the first consumer model, so now would be a good time to start saving your pennies.

Part motorcycle, part helicopter, Malloy’s Hoverbike packs a 1170cc 4-stroke engine that delivers more than 650-pounds of upward thrust via two ducted propellers in the front and back of the seating area. While he’s yet to actually fly the thing around — a minor detail that we should all overlook as to not drain our excitement — Malloy estimates that the Hoverbike is capable of achieving trouser-soiling altitudes of 10,000 feet or more, and reaching speeds of 150 knots, or about 173 MPH.

Recommended Videos

Built with a carbon fiber frame, the Hoverbike has a dry weight of about 231 pounds — less than most motorcycles. That’s especially impressive considering the thing is pretty big — just short of 10 feet long and more than 4 feet wide.

hoverbike
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While a Hoverbike might sound too good to be true, Malloy seems to have the necessary credentials to be a successful hobby awesomeness-maker. GizMag reports that Malloy “works in the mechanical design of airborne and ground based hyperspectral sensors at an optical engineering company in Australia.” He is also an avid helicopter pilot.

The Hoverbike is controlled entirely using the handlebars, which are outfitted with a variety of controls, including thrust and all the various steering options. The Hoverbike website describes the high-flying vehicle as “very safe,” but stipulates that passengers may need to wear a parachute to avoid certain death.

One added bonus for anyone in the US who plans to purchase a Hoverbike once it’s available: Malloy guesses that the aircraft would be classified in as an “ultralight” by the FAA, which means no pilot’s license would be necessary for legal fight.

So, what would one use the Hoverbike for, you ask? According to Malloy, good Hoverbike activities include “aerial cattle mustering,” “search and rescue,” “power line inspection” and aerial surveying. “Getting chicks” is conspicuously absent from the list, though we suspect this would be its primary use.

(P.S. Malloy has funded the Hoverbike almost entirely himself. So if you want to see this dream vehicle become a reality, feel free to donate here.)

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more