Skip to main content

Biking hipsters invent an airbag-inspired invisible helmet

Invisible helmet Hovding
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Helmet hair. We’ve seen it, experienced it, and collectively despise it. No matter how well-designed a helmet is, if it wraps around your scalp, it’s bound to restrict your hair from its natural, airy shape. 

Swedish industrial design students Anna Haupt and Terese Alstin decided the solution would be to not cover your hair with anything at all, all while still providing the protection of a helmet. The duo accomplishes this by creating the Hövding invisible helmet. At a glance, the “helmet” looks more like a collar or an oversized scarf, but it draws inspiration from a traditional car airbag which only inflates upon impact. 

Recommended Videos

Hovding invisible helmet fashionprints“They told us it was impossible,” Haupt told Forbes. But after six years of development, the invisible helmet has undergone multiple drop, hit, and shock tests to provide up to three times better coverage than traditional helmets. When deployed, the airbag helmet wraps around the wearer’s skull to cushion the head and provide more surface area coverage. The helmet knows when it inflate thanks to the algorithm that calculate real-time data from embedded accelerometers to determine “abnormal” speeding patterns associated with accidents.

These movement patterns were collected from a study of stunt drivers and crash dummies to identify common head movements and speeds. Once triggered, gas generators fill up the helmet within 0.1 second, surrounding the wearer in a space-like headgear. The Hövding also comes with LED lights to indicate battery levels for the internal software that saves speeding data to help Haupt and Alstin collect more information for future productions. To recharge, users simply plug the collar into an USB port.

Of course, there are other risk factors to take into consideration with the openness of this design. Not all bicycle and motorcycle accidents occur from just vehicle crashes; If cyclists aren’t paying attention, they can easily run into low-hanging street signs or other speeding obstacles. What if the helmet accidentally deploys after sensing sudden breaks that often don’t result in injuries? At the current price tag of €400, or $520 USD, the Hövding invisible helmet is an expensive alternative to traditional helmets – especially when you consider its one-time use appeal. Is all this worth a stylish accessory and keeping your hair neat?

Knowing the issues at hand, Haupt and Alstin are working to change some electronic designs to help lower production costs. They also aim to offer more collar colors and patterns to make it fashionable and encourage safety gear. It may not be the best solution to helmet hair meets utmost protection, but it’s a start at where everyday objects can start becoming smart enough to defend us in real-time.

Natt Garun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
An avid gadgets and Internet culture enthusiast, Natt Garun spends her days bringing you the funniest, coolest, and strangest…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more