Skip to main content

BioMetrics BioVault 2.0


When it comes to keeping things locked up, combination or key safes just seem terribly outdated. Not in a quaint, nostalgic way – like pocket watches or trains – we’re talking about the same technology you used to use to lock up your books in high school, and probably a sweat-stained bag of t-shirts and shorts at the gym. It works, but there’s nothing particularly impressive about it, and chances are you’re going to be fumbling with the lock a few times before you really get the hang of it (although it shouldn’t be making you late to fifth period biology, anymore.)

Recommended Videos

Sequiam Biometrics’ BioVault 2.0 safe, on the other hand, looks like it was pried off the wall of a futuristic Doom 3 space station. The slim black vault with dual front doors and a curvaceous design screams different, and means it too: It’s one of the few next-generation safes that use biometric fingerprint-recognition technology to provide access.

At first glance, this can easily be dismissed as a gimmick. After all, combination and key locks do provide an adequate level of security, and a safe isn’t exactly a flashy item you’ll be showing it off to visitors in your home. But for those who intend to store firearms, a fingerprint lock has the key advantage of being quick: Just swipe your finger down the front reader and a second later the spring-loaded doors pop open. In the home-intrusion scenarios that many gun owners intend to prepare for, this can conceivably make the difference between a burglar walking in on an armed homeowner or one fumbling with a lock. Biometrics claims gun owners should be able to fit up to four firearms in the unit, depending on size, as well as ammunition. And, an added advantage, there’s no key for kids to find or combination for them to figure out – only a legitimate finger swipe from the owner will do.

BioMetrics BioVault 2.0
Image courtesy of BioMetrics

Since the unit is electronically controlled, it will, unlike a conventional safe, need electricity to operate. Three D cells should power the safe for an entire year, or an included AC adapter can run it off of wall current. Fortunately, the BioVault uses non-volatile flash memory to store fingerprints, meaning that dead batteries or a power failure won’t cause the safe to fail, and it will still work when you fire it back up.

An LCD display on the front of the unit is intended to make the setup process easier, by guiding first-time users through the process with instructions. Enrolling fingerprints in the system involves swiping a finger three times to give the unit an accurate impression. As an extra techie touch, the screen will even display each fingerprint on the LCD as they enter the system to let you know what your own unique biometric identifier looks like. Up to 50 fingerprints can be enrolled, which should be more than enough unless you’re living in a particularly large fraternity or cult compound.

And in case you were wondering: No, the BioVault cannot be opened with a sawn-off finger. It’s actually sensitive enough to determine whether your digits are alive or not, and it won’t work if it detects that they aren’t. So would-be thieves: Don’t get any ideas.

As you might expect, you’ll pay a slight premium for the fun of pretending your house is a high-security FBI lab. The BioVault 2.0 retails for $399 USD, but can be found for much lower from online retailers with a little Googling. That’s more than conventional units of the same size go for, but right on par with the few other fingerprint safes out there. But if keeping your valuables a literal finger touch away appeals to you, the extra money may just be well spent. Find out more on their website.

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more
Rivian, VW venture kicks off next-gen platform for R1, Scout EVs
Rivian R2, R3, and R3X

The big challenge for Rivian, the EV maker known for its innovative electric and software systems, has long been how to reach the next stage of growth.

That stage came within reach in June, when the California-based company and Volkswagen announced a joint venture involving a $5 billion injection from the German automaker.

Read more