Skip to main content

Terrifying handheld blaster can fire playing cards at 120 miles per hour

Shoot playing cards at 200 km/h!

There are times when engineers use their amazing powers of invention, testing, and construction for good; creating world-changing technologies with the potential to improve all of our lives in some profound way. Then there are times when they use those same skills to build handheld cannons that fire playing cards at 120 miles per hour. In his latest video, YouTuber The Practical Engineer, a.k.a. Emiel Noorlander, falls into the second of these two categories. And we’re not complaining for a second!

Recommended Videos

“As a kid, I tried to learn how to throw playing cards for a bit, but I never got it,” Noorlander told Digital Trends.

Noorlander is making up for lost time. Inspired by a similar previous creation by ex-NASA engineer Mark Rober, only more compact and a bit simpler, Noorlander’s handheld blaster is a pretty awesome creation. It looks like the deadliest possible label-spitting pricing gun for angry retailers.

As he explains on his website, the device boasts a pair of motors. One pulls a single card from a deck, and the second sends it spinning out at incredibly high speeds. “As of now, I have only turned it up to about 60% of what it can do because that is about when it starts feeling unsafe,” he writes.

Playing card gun 1
The Practical Engineer/Emiel Noorlander

“The biggest challenge here for me was dealing with the high [revolutions per minute] of the motor,” Noorlander told me. “The motor spins at 20,000 RPMs, [which] means that even the tiniest bit of unbalance in the wheel can cause a lot of problems.”

He isn’t, of course, the only person to make terrifying DIY weapons and post evidence of them online. Whether it’s flamethrowers that would put Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood’s Rick Dalton to shame or a 3D-printed rubber-band gatling gun capable of firing off 48 shots per second, Digital Trends has covered them all. Like so many of these madcap inventions, however, you’ll have to build your own if you want to start firing off playing cards like The X-Men’s Gambit on large quantities of caffeine.

That’s because Noorlander says he’s not looking to commercialize it any time soon — and with good reason. “With devices like this I [don’t] plan to make them to sell,” he said. “Mainly because I don’t want to deal with liability issues.”

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more