Skip to main content

Laser tracking of blood-enhanced dye shows promise for cancer detection

Fluorescence has been the de facto method for analyzing biomolecules, but the technique has its limitations. When conditions are right, these fluorescent dyes and proteins will glow brightly, making them easy to detect with conventional tools. More often than not, there is background noise that drowns out the fluorescence and makes detection almost impossible. Not happy with that limitation, scientists have developed a “living laser” technology that uses biological components, usually proteins, to enhance the fluorescent signals and make it possible to detect the molecules even when the signals are weak. In the latest example of a living laser, scientists are pushing the envelope by using blood as a critical component.

Detailed in an article recently published in the Optical Society of America Technical Digest, the blood laser uses a dye called indocyanine green (ICG) that is popular in medical imaging and fluoresces in near-infrared light. On its own, the ICG molecule produces a weak light signal that is difficult to detect in situ. To improve the method, researchers started to search for living components to boost the resulting fluorescent signal and that’s when they stumbled upon blood. When the researchers added blood to the mix, they discovered that the ICG dye bound to the plasma proteins in the blood. This combination generated an intense light that the researchers could detect.

Recommended Videos

Though promising, the procedure faces scrutiny from the public, which likely will be leery of a technique that combines lasers with blood, a unusual combination that sounds like it was pulled straight from the pages of a sci-fi novel. Researchers also have to tweak the process, so the laser and the resulting fluorescence are within safe limits. “You don’t want to burn the tissue,” said researcher Xudong Fan to New Scientist. (We agree.)

The research team eventually hopes to use this blood-based system in the living tissue of a patient in order to detect cancer. In this future scenario, a doctor could wave a laser wand over a patient’s arm and use the resulting fluorescence to detect whether there was evidence of cancer under the patient’s skin.

Kelly Hodgkins
Kelly's been writing online for ten years, working at Gizmodo, TUAW, and BGR among others. Living near the White Mountains of…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more