Boeing’s folding wings could save airlines money, but you’ll still get nickeled and dimed

By Les Shu Published November 19, 2013

boeings folding wing design save airlines money youll still nickeled dimed boeing 777x 1 — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Over in Dubai this past weekend, Boeing finally unveiled its highly anticipated new airplane, the 777x. If you have read any of the business news surrounding the aircraft, then you know it sold like gangbusters – Boeing took in 259 orders for a plane that isn’t even scheduled to take flight until 2020. So, why are airlines (mainly ones based in the Gulf) flocking to this new jet? It’s the promise of cost-savings, thanks to new engine and wing technology.

The 777x isn’t a completely new plane, but the next evolution of the 777, one of Boeing’s best-selling models (if you’ve ever flown long-haul to Europe or Asia, you’ve most likely traveled in a 777). As airlines continue to cut costs, they are looking to more fuel-efficient planes, like Boeing’s 787 and Airbus’s upcoming A350. In addition, the 777x (dubbed the “mini jumbo”) is attractive because it has large capacity, flies far, is familiar to pilots, etc.

Recommended Videos

In order to make the 777x more efficient, Boeing is using a new engine from GE Aviation, called the GE9X, and longer composite wings based on the technology used in the 787. While longer wings can improve efficiency, it’s a problem for airports that can’t accommodate them (it’s one reason why many airports cannot handle the larger Airbus A380 double-decker). As a solution, the ends of the 777x’s wings will fold up when the plane is on the ground, shortening the wingspan by 20 feet.

boeing-777x-2 — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Every airline in the world is looking to buy new planes that are more economical to fly (Gulf-based airlines, which are looking to become global juggernauts, depend on these large, long-haul planes to shuttle travelers between Asia, Europe, and the Americas), and plane makers from Boeing to Airbus, Bombardier to Embraer are working on designing more fuel-efficient models. Fuel is often cited as the main operational expense, and reduced costs equate more savings. However, don’t expect airlines to lower fares. Despite these more efficient airplanes, airlines will continue to charge its customers fees wherever they can.

(Via MIT Technology Review; images via Boeing)

Topics

Emerging Tech

Former Digital Trends Contributor

I am formerly a senior editor at Digital Trends. I bring with me more than a decade of tech and lifestyle journalism…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.