Skip to main content

Why waste a coffin when you can decompose in a ‘mushroom death suit’?

One thing is for sure about this thing we call life: nobody gets out alive. We’re all going to punch out eventually, and when we do, we’re either buried or burned — but contemporary burial practices in the Western world don’t just have a high financial cost, they also incur an environmental impact. Human bodies are typically prepared for burial with a host of harmful chemicals that can leech into the ground, even though a casket. And cremation — which spews a huge amount of carbon into the atmosphere– isn’t much better. So to help keep human death from polluting the Earth, NYC startup Coeio has created a new line of  burial products designed to help the body decompose in a totally organic process.

The company’s Infinity Burial death suit is laced with mushroom spores that were specifically chosen to support the natural decomposition of flesh. The mushrooms are from a “unique strain of fungi that will be trained to decompose and remediate the industrial toxins in bodies”, according to the Coeio website. Coeio co-founder Jae Rhim Lee said she started by feeding common mushroom strains (like shiitake and oyster mushrooms) strands of her own hair, pieces of dead skin, and nail clippings in order to encourage them to use human parts as a food source.

Jae Rhim Lee: My mushroom burial suit

Conventional burial practices and even cremation processes usually make use of chemicals that are harmful or even toxic for the environment. Removing products like embalming fluid from the equation and introducing strains of fungi that purify accumulated body toxins during decomposition has led Coeio to call their Infinity Burial system “the ultimate green funeral”.

Recommended Videos

Lee first announced the Infinity Burial concept at a TED talk in 2011, but the products are expected to finally launch this summer. The Infinity Burial suit will retail for about $1,000, while a smaller, simpler pet version of the suit will probably launch a little earlier and cost a little less. So far, Coeio has already started putting together an early adopter program for living volunteers who want to help build feedback around the project in order to make death a little easier on the planet.

Chloe Olewitz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chloe is a writer from New York with a passion for technology, travel, and playing devil's advocate. You can find out more…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more