Skip to main content

Hands on: DJI Phantom 4

With the Phantom 4, DJI finally has a wicked drone fit for anyone to fly

DJI’s Phantom 4 has been completely redesigned from the ground up, and it’s now faster, nimbler, and even easier to fly. The two most novel features introduced are collision avoidance and ActiveTrack. Two front-facing cameras found in the landing gear, along with rear-facing cameras below, act to detect when an obstacle is in its way, and avoid the obstacle completely autonomously. And with ActiveTrack, just highlight the subject you want to follow and ActiveTrack will automatically and effortlessly follow the subject with collision avoidance on.

I was able to highlight my car with ActiveTrack in a mountainous area, and the Phantom 4 stayed on my tracks the entire time for an entire mile, all until I pulled over and took control. It works incredibly well, and is really fun to use.

Recommended Videos

The Phantom 4 also introduces Sport Mode, and which is completely ludicrous. Sport Mode allows the Phantom 4 to lean a full 45 degrees to achieve maximum speeds of 45 mph without wind assistance. It wasn’t uncommon for me to hit more than 60 mph during my flights with the wind behind my back. Sports Mode is loads of fun to use and transforms the Phantom 4 into an animal. GPS assistance is still enabled in Sports Mode, but because the Phantom 4 leans up to 45 degrees, collision avoidance is turned off.

Collision control adds a whole new element to introductory flying. Using two cameras in front and below, the Phantom 4 can intelligently detect when it is approaching an obstacle and needs to stop. In every instance I flew the Phantom 4 into harms way, collision control would alert me to its presence, and even stop me if I approached within 10 feet. Collision control in the Phantom 4 makes me feel much more confident while flying, especially in mountainous terrain, but I wouldn’t try to intentionally hit everything you see just to see if it works. Think of it more as insurance to help keep your drone safe.

Battery life improves upon from the Phantom 3 Pro and Inspire 1, but unfortunately at an average of 20 minutes I didn’t come close to the advertised 28 minutes. This is probably because I’m always flying throttle forward, and it’s hard to tell how DJI comes up with its metrics, but I never felt like my flights were too short. For instance, I was able to confidently fly close to two miles away and still return with power to spare.

The icing on the cake is the incredible 4K footage. The lens in the Phantom 4 has been redesigned to be sharper around the edges, reduce curvature effect, and also reduce chromatic aberration. The footage the Phantom 4 captures is simply incredible. The entire field of view is in focus, colors are accurate, and I have just as much fun reviewing my footage as I do flying the Phantom 4. I’ve flown 200 missions on the Inspire 1 with its stock Zenmuse X3 camera, and I feel the Phantom 4 actually produces better footage.

At $1,399, the Phantom 4 commands a slightly more premium price, but it is money well spent. All of DJI’s changes make the Phantom 4 feel more premium, and the new features, such as collision avoidance, ActiveTrack, and sport mode, blew away my expectations right out of the box. I’m happy to say the Phantom 4 is improved all around from its predecessors and keeps DJI among the beset quadcopters you’ll find.

   

Alexander Thickstun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Alexander graduated with a degree in Aerospace Engineering in 2005 and an MBA in 2011. He's an outdoor enthusiast and avid…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more