Skip to main content

A drone and helicopter reportedly tangled in South Carolina. The helicopter lost.

DJI
DJI

A drone may be the cause of a recent helicopter crash in South Carolina. If the unmanned flying object is determined to be at fault, this will mark the first drone-related crash of an aircraft in the U.S., Bloomberg reports. On Wednesday, February 14, a student pilot and an instructor told the Charleston Police Department that a small drone materialized directly in front of their helicopter, causing the aircraft to veer off course. While the instructor took the controls to avoid colliding with the drone, the tail of the copter snagged either a tree or brush, resulting in a crash landing.

Recommended Videos

Luckily, no one was hurt in the incident, although the helicopter didn’t quite escape unscathed — Bloomberg reports that the tail of the aircraft “appeared to have significant damage.” While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed that the helicopter went down around 2 p.m. local time on Wednesday, it did not reveal whether a drone was involved. That said, the National Transportation Safety Board has been made aware of initial reports suggesting the involvement of a UAV, and is compiling further information, per a statement from the NTSB.

The incident underscores the importance of strict drone regulations, many of which are already in place throughout the U.S. For example, drones are generally only legally permitted to be flown within 400 feet off the ground, and must stay within sight of its human operator at all times. Moreover, drones are meant to steer clear of any traditional aircraft. But in the numerous drone safety issues that have arisen over the years, the vast majority involve illegal flights.

In the case of the South Carolina incident, the quadcopter seemed to be a Phantom drone, which is manufactured by DJI, one of the most popular drone makers in the world. Unfortunately, neither the drone nor its operator has been located.

“DJI is trying to learn more about this incident and stands ready to assist investigators,” the company said in a statement. “While we cannot comment on what may have happened here, DJI is the industry leader in developing educational and technological solutions to help drone pilots steer clear of traditional aircraft.”

This isn’t the only recent incident involving one of these unmanned aircraft and larger, traditional planes and helicopters. On Wednesday, Canadian authorities reported a crash involving a drone and a charter plane. The FAA also said earlier in the week that it was investigating whether an air-tour helicopter ran into a drone in Hawaii.

“The likelihood that a drone will collide with an airline aircraft is increasing,” trade group Airlines for America wrote in a letter to a letter to Congress this week, along with the Air Line Pilots Association and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. But outside of an outright ban on drones, it’s unclear as of yet exactly what can be done to mitigate these incidents.

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more