Skip to main content

One of world’s busiest airports reveals recent drone near-hit involving passenger jet

A320 header
”[Image
Quadcopters are all set to become one of the biggest sellers of this holiday season, with many recipients of the flying machines no doubt heading straight out the door as soon as the wrapping comes off to launch it skyward on its maiden flight.

While most people will sensibly select an open space away from buildings and people, one or two may have the idea to fly it around their local airport, an idea as daft as it is dangerous.

Recommended Videos

Dealing with drone flights close to airports is becoming an increasing problem for aviation bodies globally, a fact brought into sharp focus by news over the weekend of a recent near-collision incident at one of the world’s busiest airports that saw an unmanned aerial vehicle fly within a short distance of a passenger plane that was coming in to land.

Related: DT’s drone gift guide

The close call, which took place at London Heathrow in July, has just been confirmed by the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). The body gave the incident an ‘A’ rating – its highest – meaning there had been a “serious risk of collision.”

The incoming Airbus A320, which can carry up to 180 passengers, was making an afternoon approach at Heathrow when, with the plane at 700 feet, the pilot spotted what appeared to be a quadcopter close by.

The CAA hasn’t revealed how close the pair came to colliding, though the fact that it gave the incident an ‘A’ rating tells us all we need to know.

According to reports, the drone didn’t show up on air traffic controllers’ radar screens and its operator is yet to be identified.

News of the incident comes just a few weeks after the Federal Aviation Administration revealed that in the U.S. there have been 175 reports of drones spotted close to airports or in restricted airspace in the last six months alone, with 25 rated as near-collision incidents.

While you might think a relatively small quadcopter would cause little trouble for an enormous great passenger plane heading its way, if one gets sucked into the aircraft’s engines during take-off or landing, the consequences could actually be disastrous.

Jim McAuslan, the general secretary of the British Airline Pilots Association, told the BBC that drones flown by amateur enthusiasts present “a real risk” to commercial aircraft and could lead to a repeat of the famous Hudson River incident in 2009 when a passenger jet was forced to make an emergency landing on water after birds were sucked into the plane’s engines shortly after take-off.

[Via: BBC]

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more