Skip to main content

Kyoto fireball was caused by a chunk falling off potentially hazardous asteroid

At 1 a.m. local time on April 29, 2017, something strange appeared over Kyoto, Japan: A bright, relatively slow fireball streaking through the night sky. At the time, astronomers were baffled as it what it could have been. But now, researchers from the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ) have figured out what it was and where it came from.

Recommended Videos

“We uncovered the fireball’s true identity,” Toshihiro Kasuga, visiting scientist at NAOJ and Kyoto Sangyo University, said in a statement. “It has a similar orbit to that of the near-Earth asteroid 2003 YT1, which is likely its parent body.”

Images capturing the 2017 fireball from different angles and a map showing where the cameras were located.
Images capturing the 2017 fireball from different angles and a map showing where the cameras were located. NAOJ/Kasuga et al.

2003 YT1 is a bright asteroid approximately 1.2 miles across, in a highly eccentric orbit which occasionally passes very close to Earth. At its closest point, it is just a little further away than the moon is, so it is classified as a potentially hazardous asteroid. The researchers believe that this asteroid is shedding material and dust, some of which is what formed the 2017 fireball.

“The potential break-up of the rock could be dangerous to life on Earth,” Kasuga said. “The parent body 2003 YT1 could break up, and those resulting asteroids could hit the Earth in the next 10 million years or so, especially because 2003 YT1 has a dust production mechanism.”

This particular asteroid is releasing more dust and rocks than most asteroids do due to its rotational instability. As the asteroid is warmed by the sun, this produces a small amount of thrust, which is matched by a small recoil. This recoil twists the asteroid, sometimes against the forces of gravity, which can cause small pieces to break off.

“The released particles can enter Earth’s atmosphere and appear as fireballs, which is exactly what happened in 2017,” Kasuga explained.

The 2017 event may have been dramatic, but it wasn’t threatening to people on the ground due to its small size. However, we may not be so lucky in the future if larger pieces break off nearby asteroids.

“The 2017 fireball and its parent asteroid gave us a behind-the-scenes look at meteors,” Kasuga said. “Next, we plan to further research predictions for potentially hazardous objects approaching the Earth. Meteor science can be a powerful asset for taking advanced steps towards planetary defense.”

The findings are published in The Astronomical Journal.

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more