Skip to main content

The world’s first supersonic private jet will be ready to hit the skies in 2023

Despite the well wishes of companies like Boeing and Airbus, innovation in the aviation industry has remained at a relative standstill, showing up more often in blueprints and patents than an actual prototypes on a physical runway. Though to the delight of deep-pocketed businessmen and women across the globe, a tangible breakthrough appears to be on the horizon.

Just this past week at the National Business Aviation Association’s Convention & Exposition, private aviation firm Flexjet officially announced it placed a confirmed order of 20 AS2 supersonic jets from airplane manufacturer, Aerion. There is a catch, however; the jet has yet to actually be built. Under construction in partnership with Airbus, Aerion doesn’t expect to even begin test flights of an AS2 until 2021, with a following introduction into service by 2023. So what makes this stand out from literally every other patent for a hyper speed jet?

Recommended Videos

Well, according to Flexjet chairman Kenn Ricci, Aerion and Airbus’ technology and performance capabilities regarding the AS2’s engine will likely be “game-changers for business travel.” Ricci continues, “Aerion and Airbus Group are moving forward impressively with the AS2’s development.”

While this doesn’t provide an exact reason outside of “it looks great” pertaining to the actual progress, it’s safe to say Flexjet — one of the world’s foremost private jet companies — wouldn’t agree to buy twenty $120 million jets without good reason. Perhaps one of the best things going for Aerion is its partnership with Airbus, a company that’s also trying its hand at developing hypersonic jets.

Aside from the production process, there’s no getting around just how attractive the AS2 would be should it see the light of day. Able to fly at a reported top speed of Mach 1.5 (67 percent faster than current subsonic planes), the jet would have the capacity to carry anywhere from eight to twelve passengers at a time. With a range of roughly 4,750 nautical miles at supersonic speed, the AS2’s primary use will be for intercontinental travel, and Aerion claims it has the ability to save three hours on trans-Atlantic flights, and over six hours on trans-Pacific routes.

Under the hood, the AS2 plans to make use of Supersonic Natural Laminar Flow, a technology that makes the jet environmentally responsible, efficient, and flexible in terms of its operational utility. Developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the technology’s performance has undergone a wealth of different tests from none other than NASA. Ideally, SNLF conserves fuel and dramatically reduces the emissions seen in other supersonic jet designs. Because of this, the SNLF tech remains one of the key characteristics pointing towards success for Aerion and Flexjet’s partnership.

Preliminary cabin renderings of the AS2
Preliminary cabin renderings of the AS2 Aerion

Don’t get too excited, though — those advantages don’t come without their own set of caveats. While Ricci glowed about the partnership with Aerion, he did admit the plane would be incredibly expensive to operate. For starters, its long length prohibits it from taking off and landing at some airports, thus clamping down a bit on its flexibility. However, where the price really skyrockets is with its gas consumption as Aerion predicts the three-engine jet to reportedly guzzle some 1,000 gallons of fuel per hour (despite utilizing SNLF tech). It doesn’t take a math whiz to realize just how expensive a ticket to ride might cost once the AS2 hits the skies.

The thing is, an exorbitant price tag likely won’t steer Flexjet’s existing customer base away from reserving flights on the AS2 (they are a private luxury jet business, after all), and the company also announced it plans on designing the interior to reflect its “premium” tradition. Much like Flexjet’s recent Red Label fleet, the company intends to craft incredibly unique decor and upholstery it deems “stunning” to put the AS2 in a literal class of its own.

For now, Aerion remains committed to manufacturing the revolutionary jet engine with Airbus and doesn’t expect to have an operational model ready until 2021. So for now, the 1% will just have to keep flying in their boring old subsonic private jets.

Rick Stella
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Rick became enamored with technology the moment his parents got him an original NES for Christmas in 1991. And as they say…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more