The results are in: Google set to announce winners of Glass contest

By Trevor Mogg Published March 27, 2013

The day when we’ll be able to walk the streets with Google-made glass and gadgetry perched on the end of our nose is coming ever closer, with the company soon to hand out pairs of the high-tech specs to thousands of lucky winners of the Glass Explorer contest which the Web giant launched last month.

Entrants were invited to post ideas on Google+ and Twitter with the hashtag #ifihadglass suggesting how they’d like to utilize the device – a smart move by Google, as it gave the company an opportunity to find out more about what regular members of the public are thinking about Glass in terms of its potential. Before now, only Google workers and outside developers have had a chance to put Glass through its paces (and on their face).

Recommended Videos

In a Google+ post on Tuesday, the Mountain View company announced that the competition results are now in, and that in the coming days invitations to its Explorer Program will be sent out via Google+ and Twitter.

“There were so many creative, diverse, and (sometimes) crazy applications,” the company said on Google+. “We’ve certainly learned a lot through this whole process and it’s inspiring to hear how much passion there is for Glass.”

A quick glance at the #ifihadglass Twitter page shows the range of ideas the folks at Google had to sift through, from “I would record surgeries for video teaching libraries” to “I would document what remains of my life to share with my children” to someone who took a rather different approach: “Dear Google, pleeeeeeeeease let me try these..oh please oh please oh please. I’d do anything!!!!” It’ll be interesting to see if that one gets the nod from the Web company.

Google noted in its post that while it had received some great ideas from businesses, the current competition was for individuals only. “However, we are working on connecting with businesses in other ways,” Google said.

So, if you entered the contest, keep your eye on the relevant sites to find out if your idea caught the imagination of those in charge – and check your bank balance too, as you’ll need to cough up $1500 before you can get your hands on them.

Topics

Contributing Editor

Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.