Skip to main content

A 1,000-watt laser blasting rust off of pipes is absolutely mesmerizing

Next time you spend a few hours de-rusting an old piece of garden furniture or scrubbing the baked-on lasagna from last night’s oven dish, just think about how much faster you could be accomplishing the task if only you had access to a 1,000-watt laser cleaner.

That miraculous creation shown is the work of Belgian company P-Laser, and can be used as a handheld tool to carry out such tasks as rust, heavy paint, and grease removal, along with a variety of other applications on a number of different surfaces. If lightsaber-wielding Jedis were forced to take jobs as cleaners, this is how they would do it!

Recommended Videos

“Think of it a bit like a very powerful version of the kind of scanner you see in your local food store to scan barcodes,” Thijs Peeters, an R&D engineer for P-Laser, told Digital Trends. “It’s essentially a laser machine gun which shoots light bullets at an incredibly high pulse rate. When the light hits the surface, the dirt layer and any oxides under it absorb the energy and then evaporate or crimp off, leaving no residue.”

Laser cleaning is both a more eco-friendly and cost-efficient alternative to blasting or chemical processes, which would otherwise be used to carry out the same tasks. In addition, one of its biggest advantages is the precision that it offers.

handheld-laser-cleaner-2
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“We are able to tune the lasers by shaping the pulse to either make it sharp or flat,” Peeters noted. “Those tuning possibilities mean the laser can be made nonaggressive when you’ve tuned it to the flatter shape, or more aggressive and focused if you want the sharper beam.”

Well, we’re sold — so how do we get our hands on a laser cleaner? Unfortunately, we might be being a little hasty. “We hear from a lot of consumers interested in doing tasks like de-rusting at home, for example,” Peeters said. “However, since this device is 40,000 euros it’s probably too expensive for home cleaning. Most of our customers are interested in industrial applications.”

But he does also acknowledge that there is constant work being done to bring down the price of such tools. Who knows, in ten years or so maybe we’ll all have our own handheld laser cleaners?

We’ll save the dirty oven dishes and rusty lawn furniture until then, just in case …

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more