Skip to main content

More than half a million hoverboards have been recalled over fire risk

Radical Moov - practical hoverboard
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The moment back in January when a U.S. safety body told hoverboard owners to keep a fire extinguisher close to their machine at all times was the moment many people took seriously the idea that their personal transporter really could burst into flames without warning.

Faulty or low-quality lithium-ion batteries were discovered to be the main cause of fiery hoverboard incidents, a situation that led airlines to ban them from planes.

Recommended Videos

And now, several months after the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) launched an investigation into the machine, eight manufacturers and two retailers have issued recall notices for a total of more than 500,000 units.

The CPSC is urging hoverboard owners to take the recall seriously, telling them to stop using the recalled products “immediately” and to return their board “for a full refund, a free repair, or a free replacement depending on the model.”

The government agency said Wednesday there have so far been “at least 99” reports of the board’s battery packs “overheating, sparking, smoking, catching fire and/or exploding, including reports of burn injuries and property damage.”

Some of these incidents have been widely reported in the news media, with a few videos claiming to show the device suddenly bursting into flames turning up on YouTube, too.

More than half of the recalled boards – 267,000 to be precise – come from leading maker Swagway, which is advising customers to return its X1 machine. Others include the iMoto from Keenford Ltd., and the Powerboard from Hoverboard LLC. Full details on all the recalled boards can be found on the CPSC’s website.

Hoverboards, which actually trundle along the ground rather than hover above it, were a big hit during the last holiday season. Their rapid rise in popularity encouraged manufacturers around the world to cash in on the phenomenon, an eagerness that led some makers to ignore safety standards as they hurried to get their products on the market.

Safety concerns earlier this year caused companies such as Amazon to remove hoverboards from their site, though with more robust safety certification processes now in place, the e-commerce giant recently started to reintroduce  a selection of boards to its online store.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
GM recalls 640,000 vehicles for carpet fire risk
2019 Chevrolet Silverado Full Line review

General Motors notified dealers recently about a recall of 640,000 2019 and 2020 Chevrolet Silverados and GMC Sierras at risk of carpet fires, according to a November 14 NHTSA safety recall report. Included in the recall: the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500 and the heavy-duty Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra 2500/3500 trucks.

"Following a crash that causes the seatbelt pretensioners to deploy, smoke or a burning odor from the area at the base of the B-pillar may be noticeable before a fire propagates sufficiently to be visible," the report states. This applies only to listed models and year trucks with a carpeted interior; vehicles with a vinyl floor covering are not included.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more