Japan: Man arrested after using drone to dump radioactive sand on leader’s office in nuke protest

By Trevor Mogg Published April 25, 2015

dji Phantom 2 Vision+ — Rich Shibley/Digital Trends

Drone technology in the hands of the masses is certainly leading to some interesting stories these days as users find a myriad of ways to utilize the unmanned aerial vehicles.

Political protest appears to be the latest innovative use of the flying machines, after a man in Japan this week used one to fly some radioactive sand onto the roof of the prime minister’s office in Tokyo. Arrested Friday, Yasuo Yamamoto from western Japan reportedly told cops he was protesting against the government’s pro-nuclear policy.

Recommended Videos

The stunt comes four years after a tsunami-induced triple meltdown at the country’s Fukushima nuclear plant, located about 150 miles north-east of Tokyo. Following the disaster, Japan suspended all use of nuclear power, though the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is keen to begin restarting some of the country’s 54 nuclear reactors.

Forty-year-old Yamamoto carried out his daring drone maneuver on Wednesday, using one of the most popular quadcopters on the market, a version of its DJI Phantom machine. The protester is said to have attached a container holding a small amount of radioactive sand gathered from close to the Fukushima plant, though the amount was apparently too small to cause harm to humans. The quadcopter also had a ‘radioactive’ warning sticker on it.

Following the discovery of the drone on the roof, China-based DJI said it would modify the quadcopter’s software to incorporate a no-fly zone around the prime minister’s office, as well as the Imperial Palace, also in Tokyo.

Yamamoto’s protest came as a court in Japan gave the green light for the resstart of a nuclear power plant in the south-west of the country, the authorities apparently satisifed with the plant’s new safety measures.

Up until now, rules governing drone flights in Japan have been relatively relaxed, however, this week’s high-profile incident has already got the government talking about the need to review regulations, a development certain to disappoint the the increasing number of quadcopter hobbyists across the country.

Topics

Contributing Editor

Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.