Skip to main content

M-Audio IE-40 Earbuds


M-Audio IE-40 Earbuds

Earbuds aren’t normally an item of any interest to the audiophile community. The tiny little headphones that rose to ubiquity with the iPod are much more closely associated with convenience and affordability than high fidelity. But many companies, such as Shure, Westone and Ultimate Ears have begun to change, that with high-end earbuds for more discerning consumers.

Recommended Videos

M-Audio recently broke into that fledgling market with its IE-40 professional reference earbuds, which claim to boast the same quality of sound reproduction as studio-grade reference speakers, with a price to match. They take many of the same technologies used in full-size loudspeakers and shrink them down into a portable ear-sized package.

The biggest innovation the IE-40s bring to the table, and the one that sets them most distantly apart from consumer-level earbuds, is their use of three separate drivers for low, mid and high frequencies. While this is standard practice in the world of conventional loudspeakers, the tiny confines of an in-ear headphone force many manufacturers to use only one driver for all frequencies. This is why the sound from cheap earbuds is commonly described as tinny or gutless – one driver alone just can’t cover all frequencies efficiently.

By using three drivers and a crossover to send out the proper signals to each one, the IE-40s achieve a frequency response of 20Hz-16kHz. They also use a patented dual-bore design that sends high and low frequencies through separate acoustic canals, allowing them to mix in the ear. M-Audio claims this reduces the “audible turbulence” created by single-bore designs.

The IE-40s also depart from the world of cheap earbuds with sound isolation to keep surrounding noise out while listening to music. Using an interchangeable set of silicone and foam tips, the IE-40s are supposed to fit tightly into the ear and provide 26dB of noise isolation. By contrast, most industrial earplugs for use in factory settings provide upwards of 30db of attenuation.

M-Audio IE-40 Earbuds Accessories

M-Audio includes a number of accessories with the IE-40s, including a custom-fitted metal carrying case. The 46-inch headphone cord can be replaced by the owner in the event of an all-too-common mishap, which is an important feature once you move out of the “replaceable” price range. For connecting to overly loud sources, like the headset jack on an airplane, a flexible attenuator will drop the volume down to a reasonable level. Ear loops and four different styles of in-ear molds should make sure the earphones are both secure and comfortable.

The IE-40s were designed for professional applications, like mobile recording and editing, and the price reflects the intended usage. For $499.95, not many iPod devotees will likely be picking up a pair, but those with extremely demanding tastes and hi-fi sources to match may want to look into the IE-40s for those moments they spend away from their $10,000 home audio systems.

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more