Skip to main content

Amazing new video tweaking program lets users edit a person's lip movements in real time

Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videos (CVPR 2016 Oral)
Thanks to rampant photo editing and fake images circulating the web these days, photographic evidence isn’t necessarily valid at face value anymore. And now, thanks to a system that will let anyone dub a video to change the very words a recorded person says, the same suspicion also holds true for videos. Face2Face, as it’s called, is a new software program that makes convincing edits to the moving lips of a person who is speaking. That way, existing videos will suddenly look like the person really is saying the audio dubbed (and incorrect) words. Real and fake will be nearly indistinguishable, on the surface.
Recommended Videos

Face2Face is still a work in progress, with a team of researchers from Stanford, the Max Planck Institute, and the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg constantly improving the program. The working prototype allows anyone to use a standard RGB webcam to capture video footage of their face, either saying words or making facial expressions. Pairing that footage with video footage of a celebrity, president, or public figure in the Face2Face program will make it look like the person is saying pretty much anything you want them to.

Matthias Niessner

The system pairs two monocular video streams (captured with a single webcam or video source) to make the finished video dub. Face2Face tracks facial expressions of the source video and the target video in order to warp the mouth movement in the final video into something believable. The system then combines the two feeds using a “dense photometric consistency measure,” and re-renders the source expression onto the target face in the original video setting. It’s scary, but even from an unfinished prototype of the system, the Face2Face edited video is pretty convincing.

The challenge to making convincing video may have a lot to do with the target star’s popularity level – if someone we’re used to seeing on TV all the time suddenly makes facial expressions that are new to the repertoire, viewers’ brains will raise some red flags automatically. Nonetheless, some savvy video hackers could theoretically make very believable video and audio dubs of perfectly legitimate speeches or broadcast appearances. Some people are afraid that this kind of system poses a threat to technology by making it inherently less reliable or believable, but the truth is that hoaxes in every medium have been around for ages.

There’s no telling what this software might eventually be used for — but we’re definitely looking forward to all the hilarious speech remixes that will undoubtedly hit YouTube once this software goes mainstream.

Chloe Olewitz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chloe is a writer from New York with a passion for technology, travel, and playing devil's advocate. You can find out more…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more