Skip to main content

MIT scientists design a drone that draws on your command

A Flying Pantograph
Art and technology are considered to be two very opposite disciplines that attract different types of people. When the pair come together, though, the results can be stunning. Just check out this drone, created by the Fluid Interface Group at MIT, that can draw on command.
Recommended Videos

MIT calls its invention the flying pantograph, an apt description when you consider how the system works. The pantograph was created in 1603 by Christopher Scheiner, who used the device to make a copy of drawings. The instrument has a pointer at one end that is used to trace over an existing drawing, while the other end has a pen that makes a copy.

The drone version works in a similar way, using a person with a pen on one end that is connected to a pen-equipped drone on the other. In the flying pantograph, an individual holding the pen can draw on a table or other surface while the drone mimics the movements on an output canvas. The drone is programmed with motion dynamics and artificial intelligence, allowing it to add its own flair and become an “expression agent” for the remote artist.

The flying pantograph is the epitome of the link between mind and machine, technology and artistic expression. “The drone, a floating machine, is relying on a slim chance of stabilization acquired by battling the vortex of air, the pressure, and friction on the canvas surface, and the capricious mind of the human artist,” write the MIT team.

The first version of the drone, Panto 1, was less powerful, communicating directly with the computers that controlled its flight. Version 2 added a more robust processing system to the drone body that allows it to communicate more efficiently with the artist. This improved real-time, two-way communication makes its possible for the user to see what the drone is doing and respond accordingly. In this mode, the artist can move the pen slowly to add long, precise strokes, or purposefully move the pen faster than the drone can respond, creating a canvas of unfinished strokes that adds an organic touch to the final composition.

Kelly Hodgkins
Kelly's been writing online for ten years, working at Gizmodo, TUAW, and BGR among others. Living near the White Mountains of…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more