Skip to main content

Mind-controlled robotic arm lets users wiggle individual fingers with just a thought

Mind-Controlled Prosthetic Arm Moves Individual ‘Fingers’
The field of prosthetics has made great progress through collaborations of technology, medicine, science, and design. But until now, most functional prosthetic hands have been limited to a grabbing motion that moves all the fingers together. That might soon change, though. Engineers at Johns Hopkins have completed a successful prototype that lets the user wiggle each prosthetic finger independently, using nothing but the power of his mind.
Recommended Videos

To make this possible, the physicians and engineers on the Johns Hopkins team first selected an epilepsy patient who was already scheduled for brain mapping surgery. While neurosurgeons looked to identify the origin of the patient’s seizures, operators placed a piece of film the size of a credit card on the part of the brain that typically controls movement of the arms and hands. An array of 128 electrodes on the film allowed scientists to see which parts of the patient’s brain were engaged when they asked him to move each individual finger one by one.

Having identified the specific parts of the brain that controlled each finger’s movement, the scientists also worked to understand the electrical brain activity required to experience the sensation of touch. The patient was then asked to wear a glove fitted with a small buzzer in each fingertip, and scientists were able to measure the corresponding electrical activity in the brain when each fingertip buzzer was activated.

All of this data contributed to the computing-based elements of the prosthetic. The team programmed the prosthetic arm to move each finger in response to electrical activity in the corresponding part of the brain. That way, the wearer merely had to think of the specific finger in order to make it move. Each finger was programmed separately, except for the ring finger and pinkie finger (which most people move in tandem anyway). Overall, the mind-controlled prosthetic has already attained 88 percent accuracy.

It’s a big achievement, not doubt — but scientists on the project are aware that a successful application of this prototype for someone who has actually lost a limb is a long way off. The research and testing required will be time-consuming and costly, but once accomplished, could make an enormous difference to people living without hands or arms.

Chloe Olewitz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chloe is a writer from New York with a passion for technology, travel, and playing devil's advocate. You can find out more…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more