Skip to main content

Kickstarter’s most successful campaigns sparked these thriving companies

most successful kickstarter and indiegogo campaigns 00 upload jpg02 cropped
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Making a massive amount of money on Kickstarter doesn’t necessarily make a company successful. In fact, there are plenty of Kickstarter companies that made millions, but failed to go anywhere after their initial crowdfunding campaigns came to a close (ahem: Coolest Cooler). That’s why we’re considering a different measure of success in this list of successful Kickstarter campaigns; some of these may not have brought in ridiculous amounts of money –though some did– they sparked sustainable, lasting success. No one hit wonders here, folks.

Oculus

Oculus Rift, Palmer Luckey
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Oculus founder Palmer Luckey started considering a Kickstarter in 2009, stating that he was sure he wouldn’t make a penny off the project. The original goal was just to pay for parts, manufacturing, shipping, and Kickstarter fees — an extra $10 bucks for a celebratory pizza and beer would make it a true success. When Luckey launched the Kickstarter in 2012, he set the goal at $250,000. By the time it ended, Luckey earned $2,437,429 from 9,522 backers clamoring for the virtual reality headset. And mind you, this version of the Rift was only an early developer’s kit, too; far from the polished version that would release to the public years later.

Oculus had already been of interest to many folks in the industry, but the Kickstarter campaign was the push over the edge. From there, Oculus raised million after million in funding from investors, with major names signing on to the project: id co-founder John Carmack, in particular, left id to lead Oculus as the chief technology officer. All of these endorsements led to something major: Facebook acquired the company in 2014 for $2 billion.

Pebble

pebble_watch_email_1-cropped
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Despite serious, big name competition in the smartwatch industry, Pebble Technology continues to assert its dominance. The company’s first Kickstarter campaign launched in 2012 with an initial goal of $100,000. It ended up raising more than $10 million. Raising that much money is certainly impressive, but it’s not always sustainable. That’s why it’s remarkable that Pebble went on to launch two more Kickstarters. Pebble Time brought in more than $20 million for Pebble, while the Pebble 2 and Time 2 Kickstarter garnered over $12 million — one million of which was raised in the first hour.

With its Kickstarter campaigns generating buzz, it’s important that Pebble delivers; and that, it does. That’s why Pebble is able to hold on to its success. Pebble CEO and founder Eric Migicovsky told the MIT Technology Review in June that Pebble isn’t interested in making a quick gadget and leaving the market. “We’re not in it for the short win,” Migicovsky added. Because of that, Pebble will continue to evolve and grow with its customer base — at least, that’s the hope for the company.

Formlabs

formlabs-form-2-cropped
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Massachusetts-based company Formlabs introduced its Kickstarter campaign in 2012, aiming to bring 3D printing to the masses. The project earned nearly $3 million in funding for the Form 1 — an affordable, professional 3D printer. One of the first stereolithography (SLA) printers for consumers, Formlabs got a lot of press. With just 12 employees when the Form 1 Kickstarter launched, it was a scramble to deliver. But they did — Formlabs finished shipping its Kickstarter-backed 3D printers in 2013. Since then, the company has grown to over 100 employees. Money isn’t an issue, either: Formlabs announced in August that it raised $35 million in Series B funding.

Formlabs is now selling a follow-up to the Form 1, aptly named the Form 2. And the Form 2 is not just a minor upgrade to the Form 1; it’s a major overhaul — and better than the Form 1 in many ways.

Awl & Sundry

slider1-cropped
https://www.awlandsundry.com/

Awl & Sundry founder Nikunj Marvania headed to Kickstarter to launch his company. The startup had been founded nine months before the Kickstarter was created as a way to “democratize the luxury of bespoke fashion.” Ten of the top hand-made designs were available for purchase through the project. Four hundred backers contributed more than $90,000 in funding, blowing away the company’s original goal of $30,000.

From there, the company grew exponentially, offering an incredible selection of high quality men’s footwear. Ordering online isn’t the only option anymore, either; those interested can head over to the Awl & Sundry showroom for a custom fitting. There’s even an option to design your own custom shoe, if that’s your thing.

Reading Rainbow

rrstill-cropped
readingrainbow.com

Reading Rainbow is back, and we have Kickstarter to thank. Reading Rainbow host LeVar Burton took to the crowdfunding platform to bring Reading Rainbow back for kids everywhere. The show started in 1983 and inspired kids everywhere to read; it’s show many of us remember fondly from our youth. But TV isn’t where kids get most of their media anymore — it’s the internet. That’s why Burton launched a Reading Rainbow app for tablets. The app, though, didn’t have the reach Burton was striving for. That’s where Kickstarter came in.

The Kickstarter program allowed the app to reach more platforms and more classrooms — giving away many subscriptions for free. Reading Rainbow’s initial Kickstarter goal was set at $1 million. In the end, Reading Rainbow earned more than $5 million from its backers. Its growth continues to be sustained by monthly memberships, vowing to continue to bring the Reading Rainbow virtual library to as many schools and homes as possible.

Nicole Carpenter
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nicole is a freelance video game and tech writer from Massachusetts. She has a cat named Puppy.
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more