Skip to main content

Mt. Gox hit with class action lawsuit over $400 million Bitcoin loss

mt gox hit class action lawsuit mark karpeles
Mark Karpeles, CEO of Mt. Gox Image used with permission by copyright holder

It was only a matter of time.

An Illinois man has filed a class action lawsuit against Mt. Gox, once the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange, for its loss of approximately 750,000 Bitcoins – about 6 percent of all Biticoins currently in circulation. The lost Bitcoins, which the company claims were stolen, hold a current value of more than $400 million.

Recommended Videos

The 32-page legal complaint, filed Thursday by Gregory Greene in the U.S. District Court in Chicago, accuses Mt. Gox and its CEO Mark Karpeles of consumer fraud and negligence for failing to provide the necessary security to prevent theft of Mt. Gox’s Bitcoin reserves. The suit also claims Mt. Gox and Karpeles are guilty of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment.

Karpeles did not respond to our request for comment.

While Greene is the only named plaintiff in the suit against Mt. Gox, the complaint lists “all persons in the United States who had Bitcoins or Fiat Currency stored with Mt. Gox on February 7, 2014,” the day Mt. Gox halted all customer withdrawals. At the time, Mt. Gox claimed it was trying to resolve a technical issue related to the Bitcoin algorithm.

Problems escalated on Monday, when Mt. Gox went entirely offline. A document leaked soon after the exchange shut down revealed that Mt. Gox lost more than 744,000 Bitcoins “due to malleability-related theft which went unnoticed for several years.” While the veracity of the document was initially in question, it appears to be legitimate.

Greene, who says he began using Mt. Gox in 2011, claims the exchange “intentionally and knowingly failed to provide its users with the level of security protection for which they paid.” He also claims the shutdown of Mt. Gox caused the market price of Bitcoin overall to drop, thus reducing the value of Greene’s lost Bitcoins to around $25,000.

“Because Mt. Gox did not sufficiently protect its service, including Greene’s Bitcoins, Greene did not receive the entirety of the services he paid for, and as a result, he paid more than he otherwise would have for such services,” the complaint reads. “Worse yet, at the time Mt. Gox shut down, Greene had used Mt. Gox’s services to store and protect bitcoins with a present value of approximately $25,000 dollars.”

The lawsuit also alleges that Karpeles “personally profited by shutting down Mt. Gox and obtaining users’ Fiat Currency and Bitcoins worth millions of dollars.

“This is either a case of gross incompetence, a real breach of fiduciary care, or an outright fraud,” said attorney Jay Edelson of the Denver-based Edelson law firm, which filed the suit. “People put their trust in Mt. Gox to take reasonable measures to prevent this type of theft. Now individual consumers are out tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not more.”

Hours after the lawsuit was filed, Mt. Gox, which is based in Tokyo, filed for bankruptcy protection in a Japanese court. During the hearing, Karpeles revealed that, in addition to the 750,000 Bitcoins belonging to customers, Mt. Gox also lost 100,000 of its own Bitcoins.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more